The Filter Bubble's Everywhere
In the
pre-Internet era, one read the same magazines and newspaper all the time. We
exchanged views with our friends and co-workers. Few sought diverse opinions.
That’s just human nature. On the Internet, the problem got aggravated because
we don’t even realize how sites work, as Shane Parrish
says:
“Many sites offer personalized content selections,
based on our browsing history, age, gender, location, and other data. The
result is a flood of articles and posts that support our current opinions
and perspectives to ensure that we enjoy what we see.”
Search for
“British Petroleum” on Google, and it will throw up either stock analysis or
environmental articles at the top, depending on your preferences! Eli Pariser
calls this tendency of algorithms to dictate what we encounter online as the
“filter bubble”. Even when we click on links shared by our friends, we end up
in echo chambers. Why? Because our friends’ views usually align with ours…
Then there’s the
advertising that seems to follow us around the Net:
“Most of us have experienced the odd
sensation of deja vu as a product we took a look at online
suddenly appears everywhere we go online, as well as in our email
inboxes.”
It gets worse:
search Dictionary.com for the meaning of the term “depression” and you’ll find
antidepressant ads as you surf around the Net!
Pariser wrote that
the filter bubble is dangerous in democracies:
“Democracy requires a reliance on shared
facts; instead we’re being offered parallel but separate universes.”
Of course, this
problem isn’t unique to the Net. It is true for newspapers and TV channels as
well, which have their own slants on politics.
We can blame the
media (pre- and post-Internet) all we want, but the reality is that the problem
lies with our nature. As Pariser says:
“Consuming information that conforms to our
ideas of the world is easy and pleasurable; consuming information that
challenges us to think in new ways or question our assumptions is frustrating
and difficult.”
But even if try to
find and read opposing/different views, as Seth
Godin says, we soon become tempted to give up:
“…to avoid falling into a rabbit hole of
wasted time, misogyny and dissatisfaction. This is to avoid the endless
clicking, the hateful comments, the mind-numbing noise of the net.”
And yet, as Godin
says:
“Tempting
to give up, but ultimately worth the effort. The easier the filter is to build,
the less it's worth.”
Comments
Post a Comment