Breaking Away - 1

When Donald Trump became the US President, lots of Americans said they were considering moving to Canada. Of course, nothing of the sort happened, but it does raise a related (but much bigger in scope) question: if things are bad, is that grounds for seceding? I don’t ask that in the context of the US, but world-over. Scotland from Britain? Calatan from Spain? Quebec from Canada? Kashmir from India? Kurds from Iraq and Turkey?

Tyler Cowen tried to come up with a valid “criteria” for exactly that question. While not perfect, it still made for interesting reading. Cowen starts with this:
“Secession is a check against potential tyranny. If the rule of a centralized authority becomes too oppressive, part of the larger unit can break away and move toward freer and more democratic policies.”
He cites Estonia breaking away from the Soviet Union in 1991 as an example. Estonia didn’t just secede, they now have a better form of governance.

How about leaving because of “differences of ethnicity, religion, language or background culture”? Like Scotland or Catalan or Kashmir? In these cases, Cowen is bang on target when he says that “it’s not obvious whether a unified or a newly independent government would result in greater liberty and prosperity”.

For better or for worse, it’s a no-brainer if all parties agree to a secession. Like when the Czech Republic and Slovakia were formed from the erstwhile Czechoslovakia. But that is rarely the case. One side usually opposes any split, and it can lead to the suppression of rights and even war (Cowen cites the American Civil War as an example).

Another interesting criteria is distance, as in when the parts are separated by an ocean. Like America from England. I can also think of East and West Pakistan separated by India. In such cases, Cowen’s argument is that a union is so impractical that it might as well be abandoned. Then again, Alaska is very much a part of the US…

Ultimately though, Cowen feels there is usually a third option on the table:
“The real choice isn’t secede vs. don’t secede, but rather secede vs. wait and see if things get better. When you add in the value of the wait-and-see option, the correct choice is usually not to secede, unless one is living under unacceptable tyranny.”

To all of the above, I’d add another criteria: do those in favour of secession feel confident that they could thrive as a separate nation? Because, by that criteria, an independent Kashmir (if it were a possibility) would either get consumed by one of its nuclear armed neighbors or become a buffer state and a proxy battleground for those very neighbors. Buy hey, are the Kashmiris thinking long term?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more