Is Violence Really on the Rise?
Many older people
will rue the “good old days”. Some aspects are obviously individual
preferences; which means they are subjective and hence there’s nothing to argue
about on those points. How about something more objective, something that is not just an opinion?
Steven Pinker
looked at the evidence of the amount of violence over the years in his book, The
Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined: the book’s
title makes obvious the conclusion he came to. But that seems so
counter-intuitive when ISIS, Ukraine, Gaza, terrorism, violence against
children and rapes are in the news/our minds all the time. Most people would
agree with Michael Ignatieff’s description of today’s world:
“The tectonic plates of a world order that
are being pushed apart by the volcanic upward pressure of violence and hatred.”
Pinker wrote an article
summarizing his book’s points. So how does he explain all such news?
“News is about things that happen, not
things that don’t happen. We never see a reporter saying to the camera, “Here
we are, live from a country where a war has not broken out”—or a city that has
not been bombed, or a school that has not been shot up.”
Bad news sells.
And based on all the bad news follows what Daniel Kahneman called the
“availability bias”:
“Since the human mind estimates probability
by the ease with which it can recall examples, newsreaders will always perceive
that they live in dangerous times. All the more so when billions of smartphones
turn a fifth of the world’s population into crime reporters and war
correspondents.”
And then there’s
the media tendency to sensationalize things to sell more copies, as Seth
Godin points out:
“By connecting us, by integrating cultures
and by focusing attention on injustice, the media has dramatically improved the
quality of life for everyone on the planet. At the same time, by amplifying the
perception of danger and disaster, the media has persuaded us that things are
actually getting worse. It creates a reason for optimism and then makes a
profit by selling pessimism.”
So Pinker suggests
looking at numbers instead: how many people died violent deaths in the past v/s
today? He looks at different headings under violence: homicides, violence
against children, genocides and of course, wars. The numbers indicate a decline over the decades. And so he
wonders:
“Why is the world always “more dangerous
than it has ever been”—even as a greater and greater majority of humanity lives
in peace and dies of old age?”
Comments
Post a Comment