Greatness v/s Reason
In his book, Zibaldone, Giacomo Leopardi describes
how reason can be the enemy of greatness. The one line reason?
“Few can be great unless they are
governed by illusions.”
The illusion
often is (needs to be?) borderline delusional to achieve greatness. Can you
actually land a man on the moon? Can you overthrow Newton's theories? You get
the idea. Of course, there is a very thin line between that and arrogance.
Reason can be a
dampner too. If nobody else could do it, what makes you think you can? How
could everyone, including so many smart guys, not have cracked it but somehow
you can? These are sometimes humility driven reasons; but they are also
perfectly logical questions that can kill the illusion.
Vikram Bhat had
this to say about the need for irrational optimism as a necessary
condition for greatness:
“A strict rationalist might start ten
companies each with only a 20% probability of success but promising a 10x
return on investment. But most of us can’t put our hearts into something day
after day if we think it only has a 20% chance of success...Maybe you have to
rely on your brain twisting that 20% into a 70% so that you can get to work in
the morning and give it your full effort.”
If illusions are
necessary for greatness, then perhaps Michael Dearing wasn't too far off the
mark when he suggested that people who get things done may have several of
these cognitive distortions: Personal exceptionalism (you are somehow
different/better); dichotomous thinking (highly opinionated and judgmental);
correct overgeneralization (making snap judgments and being right most of the
time); blank canvas thinking (you can do whatever you wish with your life) and
Schumpeterianism (view creative destruction as natural and as your own
vocation).
Of course, a
blog on this topic has to include Steve Jobs! Andy Hertzfeld wrote about the “Reality
Distortion Field” that Jobs was famous for creating:
“A reality distortion field. In his
presence, reality is malleable. He can convince anyone of practically
anything...The reality distortion field was a confounding melange of a
charismatic rhetorical style, an indomitable will, and an eagerness to bend any
fact to fit the purpose at hand.”
And even more
surprisingly:
“Amazingly, the reality distortion field
seemed to be effective even if you were acutely aware of it, although the
effects would fade after Steve departed. We would often discuss potential
techniques for grounding it, but after a while most of us gave up, accepting it
as a force of nature.”
Comments
Post a Comment