Big Nations, Small Wars


The US in Vietnam. USSR in Afghanistan. The US again in Iraq and Afghanistan. Russia in Chechnya. What do they have in common? In each case, an overwhelmingly superior force fails to win against a guerrilla force. Why is it so?

Set aside the role of “outside” support to the guerrillas. Of course, it exists and it plays a role. But does anyone really believe that outside support, which has to be hidden, can actually equalize the two sides? And yet…

Turns out Andrew Mack, a historian did such an analysis way back in 1975 titled “Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars”. Many of its conclusions hold good today as well:
-         The deer runs for its life, the lion for dinner: The bigger country’s survival isn’t on the line; the guerrilla’s is. Bigger the stake, the harder they fight.
-         Timebound v/s eternal conflict: The bigger country almost always has a timetable as to when the conflict should end (beyond that, questions are raised domestically about the cost of the war, whether the benefits are worth the cost, and the anger over the death of their soldiers over a cause that doesn’t affect their nation’s survival). For the guerrilla, victory is worth whatever it costs.
-         Ethics v/s anything goes: Since their own survival isn’t at stake, questions are always raised in big countries about the killing of civilians, torture and other brutalities of war. The guerrilla is never asked such questions. Or as Mack wrote:
“For the insurgents, the war is ‘total’, while for the external power, it is necessarily ‘limited’”.

So does this mean that big nations will always lose against guerrillas? I don’t think so: because the guerrilla lives at the mercy of morality of the big nation. There is no guarantee that the big nation may say that the gloves are off and hit with everything they have, all the way upto nuclear weapons. Don’t believe it can happen? Didn’t the US use napalm in Vietnam? Didn’t Saddam use chemical weapons against Kurds?

While unlikely, those options are always on the table for the big nation. And all the outside support cannot save the guerrillas from that…

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more