Wars, a Necessity


There’s that famous line from Norman Whitfield and Barrett Strong’s song, War, that goes: “War, what is it good for? Absolutely nothin'!”. A lot of such opposition to all wars comes right in the middle of a war (The lines above were written during the Vietnam War) or right after a major one ends.

But does anybody subscribe to that view entirely? Does India’s war that created Bangaladesh qualify as a useless war? Or the first Gulf War that freed Kuwait? Or how about the dharma yudh of the Mahabharata? So what’s common to those 3 wars? They all had a purpose that was defined before the war started, not some noble cause associated after the event by the victors.

Which is why I totally disagree with Ambrose Bierce’s stance (as described below by Benjamin Schwarz):
“Emerging from the charnel house, (Ambrose) Bierce shunned any effort to invest the butchery with meaning. . . . For him the war was nothing more—could be nothing more—than a meaningless and murderous slaughter, devoid of virtue or purpose.”

I do agree with Edmund Wilson’s comments that countries often try to thrust artificial and noble goals after the war is won:
“I am trying to disregard the pretensions of moral superiority with which we have tempted to clothe it. . . . I want to suggest that . . . we ought to stop talking in terms of defending and liberating the victims of “oppressors” and “criminals,” our old patter of “right” and “wrong” and punishing the guilty party.”
But like I said earlier, not all wars fall under this category.

And like it or not, sometimes wars have to be fought. Thomas Bruscino explained it very well in his article, “The New Old Lie”:
“War, after all, is about competing purposes, competing causes, competing ideals—produced by polities, defined by policymakers, put into action by military professionals, and fought for by average soldiers. War itself does not care about the relative merits of those ideals, but the outcome of war, and therefore the outcome of combat, determines which ideal wins. The outcome of war determines which cause gets to survive, thrive, and guide the lives of people in peace, and just as importantly, which cause does not get to shape the peace.”

It may be some kind of twisted irony but yes, the outcome of a war does decide the kind of peace we get afterwards.

Comments

  1. KumarFebruary 10, 2013 at 7:31 PM

    One thing is sure at least: nobody escapes wars by believing in "non-fighting" Throughout our history, we know that wars went on happening. No war monger would heed the sermon, "Wars are evil". There is a famous quote from Stalin, the dictator of USSR, in response to Pope telling telling something along the moral lines of war being bad. Stalin asked sarcastically, "How many armored divisions does the Pope have?"

    What are we left with then? Are we supposed to cynically shrug our shoulders, "Yes, yes. Wars mean destruction, intimidation, rape, murder, producing widows and orphans, misery etc. But speaking against wars is pointless. Let's take destruction, intimidation, rape, murder etc. in our stride; and get on with life"?

    Why, terrorism is also war. And the terrorists would like to win by every means possible. It is through the belief, "They are fighters for our community's cause; they are not terrorists but very good human beings" is the way many people support the evil of terrorism. What is the end of it all?

    It is confusing. We can't have peace but we are not supposed to give up our hope/aspiration for peace. This is life.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more