Color me Dead
Once upon a time,
humans “gathered colors from naturally occuring materials in the world around
them”, writes Whitney Balick. Ochre dug from the earth, charcoal, minerals
found locally, local plants, saffron, those were the sources.
All that changed
in 1856 when William Perkin, a British chemist, stumbled upon a way to turn
coal tar sludge into a colored dye:
“Perkin’s
discovery jump-started a revolution in synthetic dye-making that would change
the way most of the world made color. It wasn’t long before other chemists
began to figure out how to synthesize seemingly every color of the rainbow from
coal tar and other petrochemical products.”
This
industrialization of color set off huge environmental damage.
Multicolored waste
would find its way from industry into waterways and poison the local ecosystem.
Humans nearby had reactions to the chemicals, from rashes to outright
poisoning. The colored products could also wreak havoc, like the lead used in
paints permeated into kids and impacted their mental development.
If you thought
regulations and checks have solved these issues, you’d be wrong. As recently as
2007, Mattel recalled millions of Barbie dolls and other toys for “unsafe
levels of lead in the paint used on them”. But yes, it is true that the colored
products have generally become safer with time.
The problem though
has remained with “improper disposal of more benign ingredients” used to make
those colors in the first place. No, it isn’t just the disposal of chemicals
that is being discussed here. Even “safe chemicals” can do damage:
“Salt
might be so safe you can eat it, but if you dump loads of it into a freshwater
river, it will still kill off local species and wreak havoc on the ecosystem.”
Ironically then:
“Putting
biodegradable things into rivers without treating them properly causes far more
problems than toxic chemicals, carcinogens.”
The root problem
lies in the division of labour!
“In
most cases, the industry that produced the color is not the industry that uses
the color.”
The producer of
the color often doesn’t have the expertise, knowledge, money or ability to
handle the waste material correctly.
If you thought
that natural was good and synthetic was bad, that is not entirely true either:
“Lead
paint was popular for millennia, despite the fact that prolonged exposure to it
is fatal. Realgar was used as both a rich orange pigment and a rat poison in
the Middle Ages because it was so toxic. And the Romans used slave labor to
mine for orpiment, which yields a gold paint, because they knew it was so
poisonous that mining it was essentially a death sentence.”
Sadly, there’s no
easy solution to all this:
“If we’re really serious about reducing the impact that our appetite for color has on our own ecosystem and human health, it will mean a shift away from producing and consuming so much stuff—a hard pill to swallow for a culture oriented toward endless consumption as a symbol of prosperity and a means of self-expression.”
Comments
Post a Comment