Big Brother Watching, but Does Anyone Care?


Edward Snowden is the man who leaked the extent to which the US government was spying on its own citizens. He’s in his 30’s now, but that still makes him old enough to have experienced the way we used to connect to the Internet before the always-connected age we live in now:
“I’d wake the computer up and go online, holding my pillows against the machine to stifle the dial tone of the modem and the ever-intensifying hiss of its connection.”
His book, Permanent Record, is very, very interesting.

So why did he leak the extent of US government surveillance? Obviously it was ideological, and the journey to that set of values makes for interesting reading:
“(At twenty), like most young people, I had solid convictions that I refused to accept weren’t truly mine but rather a contradictory cluster of inherited principles… Much of what I believed, or of what I thought I believed, was just youthful imprinting.”
Around that time, 9/11 happened. And the US government totally changed its attitude towards surveillance, including at home. Snowden, a contractor at the NSA (US security agency), was once called on to give a talk on Chinese surveillance of its own citizens, as a last-minute replacement speaker. The prep work he did for that talk would change him. He was horrified at the extent of how far the Chinese had already gone… but then he realized:
“There was simply no way for America to have so much information about what the Chinese were doing without having done some of the very same itself, and I had a sneaking feeling that while I was looking through all this China material that I was looking at a mirror and seeing a reflection of America.”
Or as he puts it in another part of the book:
“If something can be done, it probably will be done, and probably already has been… The invention driving a technology rarely, if ever, limits its application and use.”

The US government in the 9/11 paranoia got laws passed that allowed them to collect data on all electronic communications, even domestically. Years later, as the hysteria diluted, lawmakers wondered if this was just warrantless wiretapping?! The government indulged in word play: it argued that the government could collect and hold any data it wanted. It only needed a warrant if it “searched for and retrieved” them from its database.

The argument got even more dangerous with the advent of the smartphone. Data about data (aka metadata) could be very revealing: Where did you go? At what time? How long did you stay there? Who was near you? All such things could be known without ever looking at the data itself! (This is the kind of info your phone has about you, and while people scream murder against Facebook and Google on this count, the US public continues to have don’t-care attitude when the US government has been indulging in the same).

I guess most people don’t understand what “metadata” means. And so they don’t care. And that made Snowden introspect:
“I wondered what the point was of my getting so worked up over government surveillance if my friends, neighbors and fellow citizens were more than happy to invite corporate surveillance into their homes.”
Think Alexa, smart-fridges and the good old smartphone.

But when Snowden did decide to go public, he had many things to consider. Was the info too technical? Would it just go over most people’s heads? And if he went to a media outlet, would the government just arm-twist them into not publishing? Worse, the media only focuses on breaking news and scoops, and most journalists didn’t understand technology anyway… Ergo:
“I had to do more than just hand some journalists some documents – more, even, than help interpret the documents.”
But even if he did that, it would be a slow process. What if he was arrested midway? So he felt he had to leave the US. But where could he go? Europe always caved into the US. The US did whatever it liked in Latin American and Africa. If he went to China or Russia, all the US would need to discredit him would be to point at which country he was located in.
“The process of elimination left me with Hong Kong.”
Hong Kong was China without being China. China would never extradite anyone to the US. And the US wouldn’t dare kidnap someone from Chinese territory.

After the exposé, and being on the run after his disclosures, Snowden still worries if things will really change in the US. After all, isn’t it true that most Internet users in the US were born around/after 9/11 and have “lived their entire lives under the omnipresent specter of this surveillance”, so it is just normal for them?

The story hasn’t ended, but the signs aren’t positive: most of us associate surveillance with corporations, not governments. And those corporations give us plenty of benefits for free based on that surveillance, so the perception we have is generally neutral and we let it go with a shrug…

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more