The Standard Model... and Beyond


Elias Riedel Gårding wrote this short and sweet article describing the particles that make up the Standard Model of physics. At school, most of us thought that list consisted of electrons, protons and neutrons:
“But atoms are not the end of the story… Protons and neutrons are themselves composed of tiny constituents called up-quarks and down-quarks (a proton consists of two up-quarks and one down-quark, a neutron of one up-quark and two down-quarks).”

Ok, is there anything in the universe not made of electrons and quarks? There’s one answer that is familiar to most people: light. And it is made of photons. With photons, are we done with the list of all particles then? Nope:
“We have discovered a whole slew of them (other particles) in cosmic rays and in particle colliders.”
Here is where things stand today:
“After much head-scratching, it has turned out that they are all different combinations composed from a small set of particles that are – as far as we know today – fundamental (ie, truly indivisible).”

There are 17 of them, explains Gårding:
Nice and colorful, but like me, it probably made your head swim. If so, let Gårding explain the pattern behind the madness of the particle zoo:
-       There are 3 generations (I, II and III above);
-       Each generation consists of two quarks and two something called leptons;
-       The particles in all 3 generations have the same properties as their counterparts in the first generation, except that each generation is heavier;
-       The Red column are the force particles;
-       And finally comes the famous Higgs Boson, which gives mass to things.

Gårding ends his first-in-a-series article by saying:
“The particles shown in the table above, together with Einstein's theory of gravity, account for every observation ever made in physics, with only a small handful of exceptions (mostly in astronomy).”

I loved Gårding’s article, except for that last part about there only being a “small handful of exceptions” that can’t be explained by the Standard Model. Because those exceptions include dark matter (25% of the universe) and dark energy (70% of the universe). Do the maths, and you realize that the Standard Model explains:
100% (total) – 25% (dark matter) – 70% (dark energy) = 5% of the universe!

Whoa! So 95% of the universe cannot be explained by the Standard Model?! Which is why the scientists on the Infinite Monkey Cage podcast titled “What Particles Remain to be Discovered” wondered, which (or both) components of the Standard Model are incomplete?
-       Are there more particles waiting to be added to the Standard Model?
-       Does Einstein’s theory of gravity need to be updated?
(It’s also possible that an entirely new edifice of explanation comes up, what is termed Physics Beyond the Standard Model).

Regardless of how it plays out, the next stage of answers should be interesting.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more