Explaining Stuff to Kids


This is how the so-called Feynman Technique to learning stuff is defined:
1)      Step 1: Write down the concept you want to understand on a paper;
2)     Step 2: Explain the topic on that paper. Not how you’d explain things to your smart friend, but to a toddler. This part is key as it ensures you avoid jargon. And it helps identify the gaps in your understanding (they’re the areas you can’t explain to a toddler);
3)     Step 3: Go back and re-learn the gaps you identified. Then try explaining them again. Repeat until you can;
4)     Step 4: Read your explanation. Does it sound easy to understand? Is it confusing? Based on the answers, you may need to revise the explanation.
Anyone with a kid ends up having to follow the Feynman Technique to some extent or the other! I guess I’ve made some progress on this because the ultimate compliment my 7 year-old has paid me till date was when I told her something was too complicated to explain and she replied, “You’ve explained other things, right? So find a way to explain this as well”.

While going over a book on space, my daughter had this Aha! look when she came across a pic of a meteor wiping out the dinosaurs. So we do know how the dinos died, she said, not by volcanoes (the other theory she’d heard of), but by a “space rock”. Nah, I replied, we don’t know for sure, we only have theories. Why can’t we find out, she asked? Before I could respond, she continued, “Why can’t they just build a time machine, go back in time and find out?”

Not sure how to explain whether or not time travel is even allowed by the laws of physics, I instead replied, “Because they haven’t built one”. Big mistake: since she didn’t know that the very idea of time travel may be forbidden by the laws of physics, she picked on the only other option she could think, one that appeals to all kids: “So they are so dumb that they can’t even build a time machine. Hmmph!”

So my next assignment is to apply the Feynman Technique to explain the paradoxes time travel throws up, and thus the question as to whether it would even be allowed by the laws of physics (assuming the universe is consistent). But regardless of my success or failure in that attempt, I am now hopeful that the seed exists in her to one day like love sci-fi, Star Trek and Star Wars…

Another thing I’ve learnt about teaching a kid is that it’s easier if this condition that Jason Fried learnt from his discussion with Clay Christensen is first met:
“Paraphrased slightly, he (Christensen) said: “Questions are places in your mind where answers fit. If you haven’t asked the question, the answer has nowhere to go. It hits your mind and bounces right off. You have to ask the question – you have to want to know – in order to open up the space for the answer to fit.”
Plus, the answer “sticks” if it fits with other things you already know.

I ran into both those points as she continued the meteor-dino conversation, asking, “How could one meteor have killed off all the dinos? Shouldn’t the extent have been restricted to places near where it crashed?” I skipped the shock wave + heat wave parts, and jumped to the parts that she already has an idea of:
1)      Kicking up dust: A mountain sized meteor kicks up enormous amounts of dust. In extreme cases, this could cause suffocation;
2)     Food chain: The dust rose so high that it blocked out the sun. Less sun -> plants die -> herbivores die -> carnivores die;

Ok, she said, that’s for land, but how about the dinos in the sea? I didn’t have a good answer, and she tore into my feeble answer, “But you said that deep under the oceans, sunlight doesn’t reach anyway. So what difference would lack of sunlight make to dinos that lived that deep?” I had no answer to that, upon which her eyes lit up, “So there could be dinos deep inside the sea? That would awesome. I wonder if they’ve sent those robots with cameras to check?”

Whether or not they find dinos, kiddo, they always find weird creatures that far deep, not just in appearance but also in how they get energy, but that’s another Feynman Technique assignment for me.

Comments

  1. Ramiah KumarOctober 1, 2018 at 1:46 PM

    Child Aditi charms of course.

    I couldn't be sure that there was some add-on and polish by the blog writer beyond what actually Aditi asked/said. At the same time I couldn't be sure that a child cannot stun adults with imaginative ideas that cross normal boundaries, either.

    By the way, Einstein attributes his success in science to as simple a thing as, "I am very curious to know. And, I am looking for the answer with a blank slate inside".

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more