Game of Thrones, Book 1
For a very long
time, I resisted reading the Game of
Thrones books. Why? In my experience, only one of the two is good: the book
or the serial/movie. Given that the serial is so awesome, I assumed the book
would be a huge letdown. But then during one of those all-too-many Kindle
discounts, I bought the books: they were too cheap to ignore! Eventually, I
read the first book.
Boy, is it great.
One of those rare cases where both the book and picturization are top of the
line. George RR Martin’s ability to build up characters, filling in the most
minor of details yet keeping it captivating, means that each character has a
mind of his own, an agenda of his own. And the agendas are highly diverse: some
are loyal to families (“I never bet
against family” - Tyrion, the Imp), others to the king (“I protected him from
his enemies, but I could not protect him from his friends” – Ned Stark), yet
others are mercenaries (“It was your blade I needed, not your love” – Tyrion
again), some do it for love (even though, as the Old Bear warns, “The things we
love destroy us every time”), and the rest are how Lord Varys describes: “Those
who are loyal to the realm, and those who are loyal only to themselves”.
So is nobody a just character then? Be careful what you
wish for, warns Varys:
“There is no creature on earth so
terrifying as a truly just man.”
But as in real
life, they can be easier to deal with, as Jamie Lannister says:
“Give me honorable enemies rather than
ambitious ones, and I’ll sleep more easily by night.”
Because, as
Littlefinger tells Ned Stark:
“You wear your honor like a suit of armor,
Stark. You think it keeps you safe, but all it does is weigh you down and make
it hard for you to move.”
Unlike almost
every other book and movie where you know who the hero is, here you only have
characters you love and characters you hate. Jamie Lannister said:
“Death is so terribly final, while life is
full of possibilities.”
And yet, any of
the major characters can (and does) die anytime. Death may be final for that
character, but it opens up possibilities for the story itself, something Martin
knows to weave fantastically. Perhaps such deaths are only to be expected
because, as Cersai Lannister tells Ned Stark:
“When you play the game of thrones, you win
or you die. There is no middle ground.”
Even though King
Robert Baratheon talks of the problems of the throne:
“Sitting a throne is a thousand times
harder than winning one… I sit on that damnable iron chair and listen to them
complain until my mind is numb and my ass is raw. They all want something,
money, land or justice.”
Why then does
everyone still seek the throne? Cersai has the answer, power:
“A true man does what he will, not what he
must.”
Wondering how
George RR Martin weaves such a twists-and-turns tale? He gives the answer in
the Acknowledgments to his 819 page first book (Don’t worry, it won’t spoil
anything):
“The devil is in the details, they say. A
book this size has a lot of devils, any one of which will bite you if you don’t
watch out.”
Game of Thrones books is a book I would never have known as existed, but for you. Now that I know, where is the incentive to read - your flow or catchy quotes seem to render reading of the book unnecessary. :-)
ReplyDeleteThe blogger says, "Given that the serial is so awesome, I assumed the book would be a huge letdown". That makes much sense to me. Seeing that the quotes carry the power of words, how a movie succeeded in bring it about? That speaks actually well of the makers of the movie.
Bu then, Seeing the way of either jolting or dwelling deep into life, these quotes succeeding in a serial form/movie form do tell me one thing. It was probably like that, I suppose, Shakespeare's wit was seen directly in Shakespeare's dramas in his own time. That, I feel, is quite an achievement.
That apart, after some hundred years after his time, this is found: in English language, the one person whose idiomatic expressions (such as 'breaking ice') and also quotes (such as 'rose under any other name smells as sweet') rank maximum (i.e. vastly higher than any one other person) is Shakespeare! This I read very recently. :-) Our opinions about Shakespeare matters not: Shakespeare holding the honor of being the 'crown jewel of the English literature' is not shaky, even after such passage of time!