'Naatak' in Karnataka


“Murder of democracy”. That’s the phrase going around to describe what’s followed the results of the elections in Karnataka. While it accurately describes the actions of the BJP camp; it also applies to the actions of others.

Let’s see why:
-         Was the Governor biased in ignoring the joint claim of the Congress and JD(S)? Yes. Was he biased in allowing the BJP a ridiculously large period of 15 days to prove its majority? Absolutely.
-         But little of what the Governor did was illegal. Exercising his “discretion” in deciding whom to call first (Largest party first in Karnataka; whoever claims to have the numbers in Goa), while discretionary, is still legal. Which raises the question: Why hasn’t any party at the Center ever framed clear, unambiguous rules on the topic? The Congress never did it, nor did the BJP or the regional parties that were part of various coalitions at the Center. Why? Because they want this discretionary power available to be (ab)used when they are in power at the Center.
-         By what stretch of imagination would it be a reflection of the verdict if we end up with a Chief Minister from JD(S), a party that got just 37 of 222 seats?
-         If the Congress, the party with a clear majority last time, fell to a nowhere-near-majority count this time, doesn’t it mean people voted it out? If they still sneaking into power via a post poll alliance with JD(S), isn’t that a “murder of democracy” too?
-         Sure, post-poll alliances are quite common across the country. But isn’t violating the verdict? Plenty of votes for the JD(S) would be from people who despise the Congress (similar reasoning applies to any alliance parners), so isn’t an alliance between the two after the polls a violation of what people voted for (or against)?
-         We call for our legislators to vote their conscience on policy matters, not just follow their party stance. By that token, why is it OK for parties to hold MLA’s prisoner in resorts OK?
-         Conversely, if you don’t hold them in resorts, MLA’s won’t vote their conscience. They’ll just vote for whoever pays them more. How is that democratic?

There are no “right” answers here, regardless of what follows and who eventually comes to power. Gopalkrishna Gandhi, governor of West Bengal, feels the problem lies in the fragmentation of votes with so many parties. His suggestion?
“The lesson of the Karnataka Kanda is this: the parties opposed to the BJP and RSS’s ideology must work together from the word go.”
This doesn’t solve anything: it just shows Gandhi’s political leanings (anti-BJP). He’s basically recommending alliances between people/parties that hate each other: Siddaramiah and HDK, Nitish and Laloo, Akhilesh and Mayawati, Mamata and the communists…

Ultimately, the likes of Trilochan Sastry are right when he says that we need find ways to reform the electoral system since hung verdicts are all too common and lead to weird bedfellows who can’t agree on anything. Because the purpose of democracy is this:
“If we get good governance from whoever form the government, then the people won. Otherwise some political party has won.”

Comments

  1. Ramiah KumarMay 19, 2018 at 12:46 PM

    Good one. We the people must feel the blog's truth, 'There are no “right” answers here, regardless of what follows and who eventually comes to power.' Also, the point suggesting that all our so called 'balanced criticism' are highly subjective, no matter how sincerely we believe in our objectivity.
    ---
    The fact remains that blaming politicians alone cannot be the right understanding. We the people are responsible for our politicians; and we have the ability to influence political behavior too. If we accept this, we can be calmer and feel responsible in the way we view our politics - not just airing views.
    ---
    India has this big advantage. We are a young nation and we are highly resilient. And, we are making progress in many directions; and that includes our politics. We need to go into the timelessness while reading this blog, it may not be only about Karnataka 'natak' which is temporal, but all time 'nataks'!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more