Is Personalized Teaching a Possibility?
A common complaint
about schooling is that different students are at different levels, but the
class proceeds at the same pace and style for everyone. I’d always felt this is
a stupid complaint, because how on earth can a teacher customize things for
every child?
But now after
reading about Mindspark, I
wonder if computer aided teaching can address that complaint. Here are its 4
main features:
1)
It has
more 45,000 test questions that evolved iteratively over the years.
2)
“Teaches
at the right level” by starting with an initial diagnostic test and then
adjusting based on student performance on each subsequent activity.
3)
“Adaptive
in approach”: Essentially, this address the problem that different student may
struggle for different reasons, for
example:
“If a student makes a mistake on which
decimal is bigger (3.27 or 3.3), it may be due to “whole number thinking” (27
is bigger than 3) whereas if they make the same mistake with 3.27 or 3.18, it’s
probably “reverse order thinking” (comparing 81 to 72 because the “hundredth
place” should be bigger than the “tenth place”).”
4)
It
forces constant engagement by complementing videos with steps that students
must complete.
You may ask how
this system fares in the real world? Turns out this was tested with 600
students in low-income neighborhood schools in Delhi with six 90-minute slots
per week:
-
The
students were split into 2 groups by lottery, one set who’d continue with regular
schooling (the control group) and the other set would be on Mindspark.
-
Average
attendance in the Mindspark group was 58% over a 4½ month period.
-
After
90 days, the Mindspark group performed much better (i.e., statistically
significant) than the control group. The key point? The performance
improvements were measured compared to their levels at the start of the
experiment: this took care of the possibility that one set of students were
better to begin with.
-
The
program covered 2 subjects, Maths and Hindi. It thus helped evaluate if such
courses are better suited for some subjects than other. That said, the
improvement in Maths was much higher than in Hindi.
-
Another
finding was that the greatest improvement due to Mindspark was to the weakest
students within each group.
Sounds good, but
how expensive is this option? The authors of the 2017
paper on this say it would cost less than “default public spending” on
education.
So is this the
future of education? Or will it run into the problem of broken down computers,
lack of budgetary allocation to fix them, and no power supply in the schools
anyway?
Comments
Post a Comment