Free Speech, Casualty of the Left-Right War
It is well known
that it is the right that has used the Internet to its advantage, leaving the
left not only far behind but also very embittered. The clamour has been growing
for some time that Internet sites in general and Facebook in particular have
enabled the rise of the right by providing the platform to circulate such
views, including, of course, fake news.
Recent bans by
some sites in the West seem to be targeting the views of the extreme right
(white supremacists and neo-Nazis). But, surely, you say that getting banned
from one site will move those folks to other sites. And new sites and apps will
spring up to offer new forums for those people, right? Not really. In fact, one
such alternative to Twitter called Gab came up and
next thing you know, both Apple and Google banned it from their app stores.
Many find this
trend troubling, especially Americans who worship freedom of speech above
almost everything else. While many of them find the extreme right worrying,
they are not sure if the growing trend of censoring and banning parts of the
Internet is going too far. It gets even more worrisome when a company that
hosts websites decides to ban certain groups. If such a host is large enough,
then that company has the power to lock people out of large parts of the Net by
blocking them from all sites hosted
by the company, which could well be a big chunk of the Net.
Remember Martin
Niemöller’s famous poem about how the (original) Nazis picked off on groups
they hated? It goes like this:
“First they came for the Socialists, and I
did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and
I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not
speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one
left to speak for me.”
Jillian York
worries whether the current Internet trend of banning the extreme right is the
same thing, except “in reverse”, i.e., it is starting with the neo-Nazis this time around!
Historically, the
left has supported free speech. But in today’s topsy-turvy environment, many in
the left support the eviction of the extreme right from the Net. York worries that
the left is not asking the next question: Who decides who stays and who is
evicted? Should the decision be made by governments or “unelected white Silicon
Valley dudes”?
All this just goes
to show how very hard it is to follow this line by Voltaire:
“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend
to the death your right to say it.”
The last line, quote from Voltaire, “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it” made me wonder the following.
ReplyDeleteRecently a woman journalist was murdered for saying what some people could not take (I may not know all details). The murder was cold-blooded. There is some voice (some rally in India, a UN condemnation) against it. Along with that, some people saying that,"She deserved it; the same fate should be there for many others who are like her" is also reported in the papers. The actual murderer does his job for a price and may forget it soon, but these people are forever murderers in their mind! Sad.
How to make people of that kind, who believe in the exact opposite, i.e.“I disapprove of what you say, hence I will put you to death and defend my right to walk free.” to come around to the Voltaire principle? Not easy of course.
If in such people, attitude change can happen, the society would benefit greatly. On an average, as are the people, so is the society. That is why, in any society, the average should tend higher, not stoop.