Historical Symbols

We are used to images of the statues of former rulers being torn down, once that leader or ideology falls. Think Saddam or Stalin. Since the rulers were hated and feared by their own population, the statues were brought down with a vengeance.

The statues being brought down in the US in recent times are different. They are statues of the defeated side from the American Civil War. Ironically, those statues were put up after the American south lost the Civil War. Not just that, most of those statues were put decades after the Civil War had ended! The statues reflected the fact that while the South may have lost the war, they hadn’t changed their minds about (most) of the issues over which the war had been fought; and that they respected their leaders who had fought, even if on the losing side.

Not to be outdone by what parts of the general public want, the opposition Democrats in the US called for the removal of 10 such statues from the US Capitol building. Politicians everywhere go with the flow…

There are even calls to rename streets for the same reasons. In one case, the US Army declined saying they were named “in the spirit of reconciliation” and renaming them now “would be controversial and divisive”.

Opponents argue that such monuments and street names didn’t come up due to any spirit of reconciliation. If that were the case, they argue, they would have spurted up right after the war, not decades later. Instead, they say, the spurt happened alongside the segregation laws that reaffirmed white supremacy.

Some feel the statues and symbols should stay, as reminders of the figures who supported slavery and even seceding from the country. A la how Germany preserves some of the Nazi concentration camps even today.

Ironically, when Donald Trump tweeted against the trend of bringing down those statues, he used the same arguments that most left leaning folks cite in similar situations. Namely to get over the past; to not apply modern standards of morality to people who lived in the past; and that today, those symbols are just part of the landscape and not much else!
“Robert E Lee, Stonewall Jackson — who’s next, Washington, Jefferson? So foolish!”
And:
“The beauty that is being taken out of our cities, towns and parks will be greatly missed and never able to be comparably replaced!”

You know the world is truly topsy-turvy when the left wants to bring down historical symbols and the right argues against it!

Comments

  1. Ramiah KumarSeptember 5, 2017 at 7:01 PM

    Interesting blog, the detail of which we would have missed. Who is going to take the pain of presenting it to us or if by chance we see it in the paper we would have skipped it.

    Interesting because, as you said in the email, for the masses the mindset seems to be same in India and America, even though the cultures and backgrounds are believed to be different. The basic human nature broadly remains the same.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn...
Read more

Europe #3 - Innsbruck

The last city we visited in Europe was Innsbruck in the Austrian Alps. After the cold and windy experience (at times) of Paris and Netherlands, Innsbruck was a wonderful change – it didn’t feel that cold, it was not windy all of which made it easy to walk around. Something absolutely necessary given how scenic the place is.   Since the hotel check-in time was much later in the day, we left the baggage and went to the Swarovski HQ-cum-museum about an hour by bus from Innsbruck. The crystal exhibits were brilliant – colorful, bright, shiny. Jewellery aside, it was a display of what one can do with crystals. While my wife and daughter loved the jewellery, I liked the superhero themed exhibits of Batman, Spiderman, the Hulk, and Star Wars. We didn’t buy anything there, though we did buy stuff in the Swarovski store in Innsbruck – jewellery, not the superhero stuff.   Innsbruck is a major tourist attraction during the skiing season but now in summer, we saw many groups of ...
Read more

The Thrill of the Chase

So many people complain about the difficulty in making decisions while shopping. Do you buy Brand X that gives 20% extra free? Or Brand Y that has 10% off? Or Brand Z that gives something else free with it? Do you buy that flat screen TV today or wait for the sale at Diwali? Now since the customer is king, shouldn’t companies be simplifying pricing choices? Like maybe offering consistently low prices all the time? Not so fast, as the US store, JC Penney discovered to its cost. Turns out that while people do complain about pricing choices, they are irrational. Also, they enjoy the thrill of the chase. Huh? The word “sale” acts like a siren call for many people: it lures them in to make that purchase. Consistently low prices don’t do the same. Besides, if a competitor lowers their prices just one time of the year, and Poof! Suddenly that low price claim becomes suspect in shoppers’ eyes. Then there are those sites that offer coupons: have lunch at Restaurant A on Wedne...
Read more