Planetary Orbits #1: Prevailing Models

Tycho Brahe and Johann Kepler are one of the great pairs of science. The former collected immaculate data from his observations of the skies; which the latter then analyzed to come up with his famous laws of planetary motion. Very fairy tale like, right? Except that reality was far more complicated, as Kitty Ferguson describes in Tycho and Kepler, her awesome biography of the two men, their personal lives and their science.

This blog, the first in a four-part series, explains the prevailing astronomical views before Brahe and Kepler changed our understanding forever.

There was Ptolemy’s model, with the Earth at the center, and everything else orbiting the Earth. In this model, planets seemed to slow down and accelerate at times and even reverse direction: this is because we on Earth are moving in a circle while observing the other planets. Hence the concept of epicycles (circles within circles) was added to the model:

How did the epicycles help describe the observed motion?
“By adjusting the size, direction, and speed of the epicycles, astronomers could explain many of the irregularities observed in the way the planets, Sun and Moon move.”
Does this sound very convoluted? Why didn’t astronomers wonder what might cause such weird changes in both the direction and speed of motion?
1)      Because it was complicated enough to describe the motion of planets, so few wanted to venture into the “why” question.
2)     Blame Aristotle!
“(Aristotle had drawn) a line between physics and the mathematical sciences, including astronomy, in a way that could be interpreted to mean that astronomers need not search for Aristotelian “causes” for celestial motions.”

But why wasn’t Aristotle’s view questioned? Ah, because the Church had incorporated Aristotelian views; and the waters were now horribly muddied. Could one contradict any aspect of Aristotle without also (in effect) attacking the Church? But what about Aristotle’s view was so attractive to the Church in the first place? The fact that he had also declared that:
“Everything below the orbit of the Moon was subject to change, degradation, and decay, while the heavenly spheres beyond the Moon were a realm of unvarying, eternal perfection”.
This aligned with Christianity’s picture of “fallen, lost humanity on Earth and eternal, holy realms above”. Which is why his views were adopted by the Church.

The alternate model was by Copernicus that held the Sun at the center around which all the planets revolved. While the orbits weren’t as twisted as those in Ptolemy’s model, they weren’t perfectly circular either.

With neither model simple in its orbits, in the absence of any attempt to identify causes, it just seemed like a matter of preference (or geometric convenience) which model one believed: Ptolemy or Copernicus. But since Copernicus’ model didn’t align with Church doctrine whereas Ptolemy’s did, no points for guessing which view prevailed at that time…

Comments

  1. Ramiah KumarFebruary 14, 2017 at 8:11 PM

    Interesting. I don't know how much this will interest who are not somewhat alive to astronomy.

    Your reference to "The former collected immaculate data from his observations of the skies; which the latter then analyzed to come up with his famous laws of planetary motion" invoked a memory of a somewhat similar situation. After the first quarter of the last century, the telescopes became very powerful and a lot of observations were made. It led to the discovery of countless galaxies. Application grew and scientific interpretations revolutionized the subject. Not only they found that all galaxies were receding from one another but also leaned heavily on Einstein's special theory of relativity to explain the astronomic domain.

    The combination of observation nature and fitting scientific understanding probably get refined steadily over a few centuries prior to our 21st.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more