Moral Foundation Theory

In his book, The Righteous Mind, Jonathan Haidt explains the huge differences between the attitudes of most (truly) moral people. Explaining the Moral Foundation Theory, he says there are 6 different axis of morality:
-         Care/harm
-         Fairness/cheating
-         Loyalty/betrayal
-         Authority/subversion
-         Sanctity/degradation
-         Liberty/oppression
The reason why moral people hold such different opinions is two-fold:
-         The ideals (axis) often clash. Take Care/harm: most moral people would consider themselves to be on the Care side of the spectrum. But how far should we go in caring? That’s when it starts to clash with the Fairness/cheating axis: to many, fairness means people should earn things based on merit, not get free handouts. Truly moral people (on both sides) have a different answer to the question: should caring trump merit? If yes, to what extent?
-         The other point is that many people give zero weightage to certain axis. Thus, conservative people give high weightage to the Sanctity/degradation axis whereas liberal people give almost none.

Set aside the politicians and high priests when you go over this paragraph. Instead answer these questions from the perspective of genuinely moral people. Does the theory explain why so many (genuinely) moral people oppose the Uniform Civil Code? Even though all religions are oppressive to women? Even though those very people do support gender equality? Is it because (for them), Sanctity (of religion) trumps Fairness (for genders)?

The more I think of the above theory, the more it seems to explain the huge differences between truly moral people. No, please leave aside the founders of religions or gurus or saints because you can’t get them together to debate a controversial/grey topic. Focus instead on the genuinely moral common man who has to apply his take on morality in real life, in day to day topics. What do you feel: does the theory explain the differences in opinions?

Comments

  1. Ramiah KumarNovember 7, 2016 at 12:27 PM

    The word 'morality' has greater Christian connotation than the Hindu's 'dharma' connotation. That is not much of a point because most Hindus' mindset is the same of a faithful Christian mindset, is so far as how to take up or view morality. In that sense, the blog's point of view does have some universal validity.

    Though you have given a little special consideration to prophets (whom you termed founders of religions), saints and also gurus, there is a sort of conclusive remark on that through "you can’t get them together to debate a controversial/grey topic". True in a way, but since there is forever flux in individual and social settings with Time continuously altering our environment and relations, it would be meaningless to imagine a conference attended by Vyasa, Moses, Abraham, the Buddha, Confucius, Jesus, Mohammad and a host of others to resolve the morality dilemma! Each belonged to different backgrounds in time and region.

    The great difficulty is that as much as the doctrines of sciences are subject to change (say, evolution of ideas and knowledge) morality is also not a stagnant thing but something that should change with time and within that sometimes with region too, since variations due to background is inevitable. However, this is a very elusive issue in religion, even though the truth is acknowledged by prophets and saints. None of them could organize along the lines of Western organizations to resolve morality! It would be wrong, indeed fatal, too.

    In reality, the word "dharma' implies two things: (i) its application is relative with respect to time, social group as well as individual hence one needs to accept flexibility (ii) there can never be any absolute sanction through any authority of one being "right" or "wrong". Intent and evaluation of the specific context play a crucial role in that, but without compromising on the core morality - 'aiming for selflessness'. In Hindu and Buddhist philosophies 'dharma', while important, is also considered obstruction to liberation strangely, because mind can bind one to trivial or incorrect ideas, particularly because of clinging to the feeling "I am doing right" while being ignorant of the terrible egotism that evokes righteousness. Enlightenment transcends morality, even if this looks weird. It is weird but it is true!

    On the whole morality is a tricky subject. It will forever remain in the domain of debates! :-(

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more