Hacked - 2

Why the Internet was created is well known: back in the Cold War era, the American military was terrified at the prospect of the USSR launching simultaneous nuclear attacks on the HQ’s of all the American military installations, thereby knocking out the ability of the US to retaliate.

Thinking in the capitalists’ way, the US decided to create a network that was completely decentralized. Knocking out an entire network that was decentralized was considered impossible. At least some parts would survive the Soviet attack; and they would retaliate.

Recently, a massive attack took down many popular Internet sites (Amazon, Twitter, Netflix etc) in almost the entire US. Brian Krebs writes:
“(It now emerges that the attack was) launched with the help of hacked “Internet of Things” (IoT) devices, such as CCTV video cameras and digital video recorders.”
How the attack works using such network enabled devices is scary:
“(It) scours the Web for IoT devices protected by little more than factory-default usernames and passwords, and then enlists the devices in attacks that hurl junk traffic at an online target until it can no longer accommodate legitimate visitors or users.”

Why is this scary? Can’t it just be fixed the way we try to defend our PC’s/laptops, via anti-virus softwares that work (most of the time)? Well, it’s because many of these devices cost so little that the password is often hardcoded, i.e., they cannot be changed. Adding security to cheap devices is simply not worth the cost, from either the customer or the manufacturer’s perspective.

Unless, that is, regulations force some minimum layers of security to be added; and retailers choose to highlight the devices with such a seal of approval. Right now, that hardly seems to be the direction in which things are headed.

And so for now, we can only muse at the irony of what Ben Evans points out:
“A network designed to withstand nuclear attack, brought down by toasters.”

Comments

  1. Your two blogs on the subject (the previous one example of the hacked car digital system leading to ransom demand) and this one giving the example "of a massive attack took down many popular Internet sites (Amazon, Twitter, Netflix etc) in almost the entire US" is informative while intimidating.

    I don't know if I am hallucinating or it is actually true in the outside world: there seems to be far too many crimes all over the world compared, at least, to my younger years. One may analyze and come up with reasons, but for a person born just around India's independence the memory of old times gives rise to the possibility of 'crime explosion', similar to population explosion. What is disturbing even more is the fact a percentage of crimes are 'just for the heck of it'. The perpetrator revels in knowing he or she has wrecked havoc on innocent or defenseless people.

    The human mind has achieved countless feats that are memorable and praiseworthy. Understandably the same mind potential can and does go in the criminal direction too. Your blogs are disturbing because one wonders if anybody anywhere is safe. :-( It may look pessimistic but there seems no solution too: if you improve the protection methods, the criminal mind works overtime to invent newer and more sophisticated ways to perpetrate the crimes!

    I can do with a lot of hope at this juncture - kindly supply me a ton of it! :-)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch