World Cup, Messi and Big Data

The first football World Cup I saw was the one in 1990. I sat up late for the midnight matches, argued over who would win or who played better. During the 2002 World Cup, I even went home from office to watch the Brazil v/s England quarter-final, the final before the final (every tournament has one such match).

But the current World Cup barely has me interested. I don’t even sit through a match that starts at 9:30! Signs of old age? Or has the Internet changed everything? I always feel “Why watch a match that may be goal-less anyway? Why not just see the goals on YouTube the next day?”

And yet, I watch Argentina’s matches (ok, I just watch more of their matches than the others’). But only to see Lionel Messi. I come away feeling that while the guy is awesome, he just produces 3 or 4 instances of magic in the entire match (it’s a different matter that those instances are sufficient to win the match). So is he over-hyped, I wondered? Or over-marked? Or is Barcelona a better team than Argentina, one that can use and feed Messi’s brilliance?

Before I get to the answer, some background: when the 1994 World Cup happened in the US, I mocked the American obsession with sports stats: who cared which team had what percentage of possession, I smirked. But those stats just kept increasing over the years after that: passes completed, interceptions made, shots attempted…all irrelevant data, I thought. Even after seeing the Brad Pitt starrer, Moneyball, I didn’t change my view on stats and sports.

Boy, have I changed my mind since reading this article on FiveThirtyEight. The article draws chart after chart, quotes stat after stat, and compares Messi against every player in the world on every parameter. Benjamin Morris’ summary?
“It’s not possible to shoot more efficiently from outside the penalty area than many players shoot inside it. It’s not possible to lead the world in weak-kick goals and long-range goals. It’s not possible to score on unassisted plays as well as the best players in the world score on assisted ones. It’s not possible to lead the world’s forwards both in taking on defenders and in dishing the ball to others. And it’s certainly not possible to do most of these things by insanely wide margins.

But Messi does all of this and more.”
There, even the maths “proves” that Messi is way ahead of everyone else! Also, the article showed that Messi’s 3 or 4 moments of greatness per match are way more than anybody else’s: I guess the problem isn’t with Messi, it’s with my expectations…

Calvin once told Hobbes:
“You know how people are. They only recognize greatness when some authority confirms it.”
Today, many only recognize greatness when Big Data confirms it!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn...
Read more

Europe #3 - Innsbruck

The last city we visited in Europe was Innsbruck in the Austrian Alps. After the cold and windy experience (at times) of Paris and Netherlands, Innsbruck was a wonderful change – it didn’t feel that cold, it was not windy all of which made it easy to walk around. Something absolutely necessary given how scenic the place is.   Since the hotel check-in time was much later in the day, we left the baggage and went to the Swarovski HQ-cum-museum about an hour by bus from Innsbruck. The crystal exhibits were brilliant – colorful, bright, shiny. Jewellery aside, it was a display of what one can do with crystals. While my wife and daughter loved the jewellery, I liked the superhero themed exhibits of Batman, Spiderman, the Hulk, and Star Wars. We didn’t buy anything there, though we did buy stuff in the Swarovski store in Innsbruck – jewellery, not the superhero stuff.   Innsbruck is a major tourist attraction during the skiing season but now in summer, we saw many groups of ...
Read more

The Thrill of the Chase

So many people complain about the difficulty in making decisions while shopping. Do you buy Brand X that gives 20% extra free? Or Brand Y that has 10% off? Or Brand Z that gives something else free with it? Do you buy that flat screen TV today or wait for the sale at Diwali? Now since the customer is king, shouldn’t companies be simplifying pricing choices? Like maybe offering consistently low prices all the time? Not so fast, as the US store, JC Penney discovered to its cost. Turns out that while people do complain about pricing choices, they are irrational. Also, they enjoy the thrill of the chase. Huh? The word “sale” acts like a siren call for many people: it lures them in to make that purchase. Consistently low prices don’t do the same. Besides, if a competitor lowers their prices just one time of the year, and Poof! Suddenly that low price claim becomes suspect in shoppers’ eyes. Then there are those sites that offer coupons: have lunch at Restaurant A on Wedne...
Read more