Where are the ET’s?

Have you heard of the Fermi paradox? Here’s how Wikipedia describes it:
“The apparent contradiction between high estimates of the probability of the existence of extraterrestrial civilization and humanity’s lack of contact with, or evidence for, such civilizations.”
Or to put it in layman’s terms: Where are the ET’s?

If you are interested, check out this article for detailed stats of why scientists believe that intelligent species should be abundant in the universe, even if we assume that life is very, very rare.

I found a couple of articles that point out that while the universe is the domain of physics, the resolution to the Fermi paradox may lie in biology!

But first, is it really necessary that a sufficiently advanced species would always explore the universe and/or want to “colonize new habitats”? As Alan Jacobs asks is it necessary that:
“Superior alien civilizations will be to us as Victorian explorers were to the tribes of Darkest Africa. Higher intelligence is then identified with (if we’re inclined to be critical) the British Empire at its self-confident apogee or (if we’re inclined to be really critical) the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany in their pomp. (It’s all about the galactic Lebensraum, baby!)”
While what Jacobs says could indeed be true, I feel that if life on earth is any indication, then life tends to spread out: just see how the DNA molecule has spread to almost every corner of the planet via one or the other life form. Sure, there might be some species that don’t have such a desire, but the odds must favour the species that does because they would survive catastrophic events in one area. Extending that idea, if the dinosaurs could have gone to Mars, they wouldn’t have gone extinct when the meteor hit earth, would they? Putting your eggs in one (planet) basket is not a good idea: surely, a sufficiently advanced species would know that.

Now to the biology: Nathan Taylor points out that to physicists, anything that violates the Copernician view must be wrong (Copernicus is the guy who pointed out that the earth is not the center of the universe; and by extension, any theory that considers any one part of the universe to be unique or special is considered anti-Copernician and hence wrong). But to a biologist, life is very, very, very rare: consider the fact that we can’t create any form of life, let along intelligent life in our labs whereas we created the Higgs Boson in the lab. To a biologist, Taylor says, “evolution follows quirky and highly contingent historical paths. There’s nothing inevitable about evolving intelligence”. To put it very crudely, the Copernician idea applies to physics, not necessarily to biology (unless we find the evidence)!

So is the answer to the Fermi paradox biological? That the evolution of life is far, far more rare than what physicists assume, and the evolution of intelligent life rarer still?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more