Arrogance and Humility
Arrogance: a word
with a negative connotation. Humility: the opposite of arrogance, ergo a
positive thing. Or so they would have you believe.
I have never
understood why people expect humility and make it sound like a good thing.
Don’t get me wrong: I am not advocating arrogance. Rather, I am saying that
sometimes the opposite of a bad thing is not necessarily a good thing either.
After all, both are extremes (boastful and self-deprecation), so why don’t people
advocate the middle ground instead?
Surely a guy who
is very good at something or did something great does not need to go around
belittling his own achievements. And yet society almost demands humility from
its members. No wonder Arthur Schopenhauer asked:
“What is modesty but hypocritical
humility, by means of which, in a world swelling with envy, a man seeks to
obtain pardon for excellences and merits from those who have none?”
Schopenhauer
then went further and attributed a reason for why this is the case:
“No doubt, when modesty was made a
virtue, it was a very advantageous thing for the fools; for everybody is
expected to speak of himself as if he were one.”
Then there are
those achievers who, like Muhammad Ali, feel “It’s hard to be humble when you
are as great as I am”. Why impose or demand a feeling from others when they
don’t really feel it?
Then there’s the
Scott Adams (author of Dilbert) view on the matter, which as usual, is well
thought out and brilliantly articulated:
“The interesting thing about arrogance is
that it's hard to know when you're doing it. It's a challenge to be confident
in your opinion without projecting an air of superiority. Objectively speaking,
if you think you have the right answer for a given situation, it follows that
anyone who disagrees is a little bit misguided, or ignorant, or just plain
dumb.”
The best quote
on this topic though is by Steve Jobs: most of us would love to change the
world, but that wasn’t enough for Jobs. He wanted to “make a dent in the
universe”! I found that phrase amusing since it is both ambitious as well as
humble at the same time: ambitious because he was aiming to impact the
universe; humble because he was only hoping to make a dent in it. Sort of like
the middle ground, eh?
Comments
Post a Comment