Animal Senses #12: Magnetism

Magnetoreception refers to the ability to navigate using the earth’s magnetic field for context. A very interesting thought experiment on this topic was to change the magnetic field around such species and see if they changed direction. In practice, that’s easy to do with small animals, but how could one try that with something as big as a whale? Sounds impossible, except nature itself creates such situations, says Ed Yong in Immense World:

“The sun periodically throws cosmic tantrums and produces solar storms – streams of radiation and charged particles that affect the Earth’s magnetic field.”

Scientists collated 33 years of data on healthy whales that inexplicably stranded themselves onto beaches. They then compared that with the data on solar activity. And bingo! On days with the most intense solar storms, gray whales were four times more likely to beach themselves.

 

The magnetic field has two components. The first one is inclination, the angle at which the geomagnetic field lines meet the surface of the earth. At the equator, the lines run parallel to the ground; at the poles, they run perpendicular. The second one is intensity, the strength of the field. Both components vary across the earth, and thus the combo can be considered as similar to latitude-longitude system of coordinates.

 

Such magnetic “maps” have a serious limitation. While they can be sensed in the immediate vicinity, they can’t be used to predict what it will at a different place. The only way to find out is to move, and move quite a lot before there is any perceptible change. This is why species that use magnetoreception are the ones that travel very long distances. It simply can’t work over short distances.

 

We know that the earth’s magnetic field has reversed at least 183 times in the last 83 million years. While these flips are gradual and won’t affect individuals, does it mean species have had to evolve to adjust for such reversals, wonders Yong.

 

Magnetoreception is the only sense for which we haven’t yet identified the associated sensor in animals. There are 3 mains theories. The first one considers the material magnetite to be the key. But nobody has found such magnetite heavy cells in any species. The second one considers electromagnetic induction as the key – species produce electric currents, which would interact with the magnetic field, and the animal could then decipher meaning via this interaction of the fields. This theory isn’t very popular for obvious reasons – it can’t work for aerial species since they are immersed in air, an insulator. Which is why the third theory, though the most complicated, is the one most widely accepted. It involves two molecules called a radical pair and quantum mechanics. In theory, it can explain how a weak magnetic signal could be converted into a chemical signal that is easier to process.

 

There are multiple challenges in studying magnetoreception. The three theories have led to very vicious fights among scientists. That has led to outright fraud in some cases, but more often, it reduces objectivity and increases bias. Another challenge with studies in this field is that the magnetic field is imperceptible to us humans and it is very weak in any case, so we can easily miss if there is any setup error or background activity that is interfering with the study. Additionally, the signal in question is very weak, so it is not clear how clearly it can/is interpreted by animals that use it. It surely cannot be as precise as light or sound, but how imprecise is it exactly? In addition, as mentioned earlier, it works over long distances, but how long? And over how much time does course correction happen? Without knowing any of these details, it is hard to study, interpret or reproduce any studies. Or is it the case that for exactly all these reasons, animals use other senses in combination with magnetoreception, or put differently, perhaps magnetoreception is never used in isolation?

“The boundaries of our own Umwelt corral our ability to understand the Umwelten of others.”

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more