The Sabyasachi Das Paper

What is it that the (former) Ashoka University assistant professor, Sabyasachi Das, did that stirred up such a storm? He did a rigorous analysis of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections in his paper, “Democratic Backsliding in the World's Largest Democracy”. But what exactly did the paper say/find?

 

Yogendra Yadav wrote this excellent piece describing what that paper said (and equally important, what it did not say). First, this wasn’t an economist writing about politics. Rather, this was a statistical analysis of certain patterns Das found. As with many things in statistics, it cannot prove something; but it sure can raise valid suspicions. Das himself admits as much in the paper:

“The tests are, however, not proofs of fraud, nor does it suggest that manipulation was widespread.”

 

Second, since this is a purely statistical analysis, it does not get into topics like EVM tampering – one needs to prove that happened, just throwing accusations is pointless. Instead, as Yadav explains:

“Assuming that any electoral malpractice would leave its traces, he analyses the patterns of outcome at the constituency and booth level and zeros in at apparent abnormalities. This is election forensics. The advantage is that this is based on official election data, not any allegation or some disputed data set… The limitation is that while it establishes a pattern of malpractice, and can help identify a mechanism as well, this is probabilistic reasoning.”

 

Third, Das’ paper notes several oddities:

-       The BJP won an abnormally high number of closely contested seats (Das says abnormally high based on comparison with patterns from all Lok Sabha elections from 1977 onwards).

-       Most of these wins were in NDA ruled states.

-       These constituencies showed another trend: they had lesser increase in the voter list, esp. Muslim voters, than the national average. This would suggest (but not prove) strategic deletions.

-       There was an abnormal pattern in the numerals of vote counts in these constituencies – the distribution of digits that would be expected by statistics wasn’t the case here. Such deviations were largely in constituencies with higher proportion of Muslim voters.

 

Fourth, the number of constituencies that showed the above mentioned patterns isn’t huge – it was between 9 to 18, as Das himself states in the paper. Yadav then spells out what that number (9 to 18) means:

“(The number of constituencies is) too few to affect its (BJP’s) majority in the Lok Sabha. So, to reiterate, this paper does not say or imply that Narendra Modi came to power in 2019 through electoral fraud.”

 

As Yadav repeatedly says, none of this is proof. But, in any democratic system, it is important that things should be fair, and they should appear to be fair. All of the above raises concerns on the second criteria – the appearance of things. Unlike the all too many wild allegations from so many, this one is different:

“It should be clear why this is no half-baked analysis, a mere speculation or a wild allegation. We can be very sure that something was fishy about the electoral outcome in some closely contested seats.”

 

I am very impressed by this paper. It is based on statistical analysis of official data, not opinions or questionable data. It repeatedly reiterates that it can notice patterns, raise questions, but is careful to admit it is not conclusive proof. It compares against earlier elections, which strengthens its own assessments. All of which is why I can see why Yadav wrote:

“My first reaction was pure envy: I wish I could do this kind of data analysis... This research paper is among the most rigorous pieces of empirical work on Indian elections that I have seen in a long time. To be honest, this one paper contains within it no less than eight high quality research papers. Any one of these papers could have made it to a professional journal. This paper alone could secure tenure for the writer in any top-notch university.”

Instead, sadly, we find the university distancing itself from the paper and Das; and Das being driven to resign.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more