Judges Making Laws

Judicial activism. Years back, there was a phase when it was in vogue in India.

“Judicial activism is the exercise of the power of judicial review to set aside government acts. Generally, the phrase is used to identify undesirable exercises of that power, but there is little agreement on which instances are undesirable.”

 

This is a problematic topic. As our Civics course taught us, it is the legislature’s job to draw up laws, not the judiciary’s. An obvious exception can/should be made if a law violates the constitution.

 

But what about the scenario where the legislature can’t/won’t frame a law? Because the ruling party doesn’t have the numbers? Or because the issue at hand is too divisive and no party wants to risk a backlash?

 

In the US, one such divisive issue is abortion. The constitution doesn’t say anything about the topic. And politicians won’t frame a law about it (for or against) since it has always been a deeply polarizing topic (not just in recent times). And so it came to be that the courts had ruled in 1973 that abortion was legal. Until it got overturned in 2023, again by the courts.

 

Rahul Matthan looked at a different aspect. On the one hand, judicial systems like to follow precedent – follow what a previous judgment had to say on the same topic. Why? It ensures consistency. You don’t want a system where people feel the outcome depends on the tendencies of the judge!

“As a result, past decisions are rarely overturned; at best, they are just distinguished from.”

(Note that following precedent is only for topics involving interpretation. If the verdict was wrong; or violated a law; or if the evidence was illegally procured, then of course, the verdict can and does get overturned often).

 

Yet, he says, abortion was overturned. The court’s reason for taking this rare step of overturning an earlier verdict?

“(Always following precedent would) compel courts to abide by unworkable or badly reasoned judgements—else bad decisions would live on forever.”

Thus, they explained the overturning as a sign of “restrain(ing) judicial hubris” - prior verdicts need not be perfect or beyond questioning.

 

As we have seen in great detail from Roman times, governance is a very complex and messy topic. We need rules, and yet there are always scenarios where the rule doesn’t make sense. Elected politicians cannot make deeply unpopular decisions, even on those rare occasions where they want to do the right thing. Cursing and criticizing the system is the easy way. But it doesn’t achieve anything.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more