Tata #3: Creating an Industry from Scratch

Flashback to the 70’s. IBM didn’t dominate the mainframe market yet. A company called Burroughs was also a contender. Burroughs had a joint venture with the Tatas to sell and maintain Burroughs in India. It gave the fledgling TCS a toehold to the world of computers and international projects, writes Shashank Shah in The Tata Group. Until the partnership ended in 1978.

 

Suddenly TCS, a company of engineers only, had to find customers and clients. Faqir Kohli was pulled in from Tata Power. Though reluctant to move to what seemed like a career dead end company, he was persuaded by JRD Tata.

 

Kohli persuaded Burroughs to sign the first outsourcing contract in Indian IT history. At a time when TCS didn’t even have a single Burroughs machine! Importing one was impossible in those days. So TCS acquired an ICL computer from LIC (whose trade unions wouldn’t allow LIC to use it since they feared computers would wipe out jobs):

“TCS built an ingenious filter to transfer the system from ICL to a Burroughs system.”

Porting software across systems – it was a vital skill TCS had acquired.

 

As Burroughs started to fade in the 80’s, international demand to port files from Burroughs systems to IBM mainframes grew. TCS was perfectly placed for such an opportunity.

 

In the mid-80’s, C++ was a new programming language, a new way of programming. TCS took a risk and sent its personnel overseas to learn the yet to be proven language. As C++ grew in popularity, TCS was ready to meet the demand for C++ programmers. The ability to anticipate trends was useful yet again when the Y2K problem surfaced – TCS was ready for that too.

“Often described as the Henry Ford of IT services, Kohli-led TCS moved software development from artisan-like activity to an industrial assembly line of a software factory.”

By the time Kohli retired in 1999, over two lakh programmers drove the IT revolution in India.

 

Initially, TCS served as a body-shopping firm – they’d hire people in India who would then be sent to the US to work as contractors. Over time, the company switched to the on-site project management model. Here, TCS would be accountable to deliver the entire project, working closely (on-site) with the client. The third model was the offshore one. In this, most people working on the project stayed in India, while a few went on-site to coordinate with the client. This last model is now called the on-site-offshore model of software delivery.

 

Today, TCS has over 4,00,000 employees, annual revenue of over $20 billion, and a market value of over $100 billion. It has come a very long way.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Europe #3 - Innsbruck

The last city we visited in Europe was Innsbruck in the Austrian Alps. After the cold and windy experience (at times) of Paris and Netherlands, Innsbruck was a wonderful change – it didn’t feel that cold, it was not windy all of which made it easy to walk around. Something absolutely necessary given how scenic the place is.   Since the hotel check-in time was much later in the day, we left the baggage and went to the Swarovski HQ-cum-museum about an hour by bus from Innsbruck. The crystal exhibits were brilliant – colorful, bright, shiny. Jewellery aside, it was a display of what one can do with crystals. While my wife and daughter loved the jewellery, I liked the superhero themed exhibits of Batman, Spiderman, the Hulk, and Star Wars. We didn’t buy anything there, though we did buy stuff in the Swarovski store in Innsbruck – jewellery, not the superhero stuff.   Innsbruck is a major tourist attraction during the skiing season but now in summer, we saw many groups of ...
Read more

Chess is too Boring

“Chess has problems at the grandmaster level...They're not getting a great game”, wrote Christian Donlan . Amen to that: Anand and his challenger, Magnus Carlsen drew their first game in just 16 moves. It gets worse: games between the top 20 end in draws 60% of the time. And Donlan adds that “games often end in resignation when an actual victory starts to loom on the distant horizon.” That often means that the average player (or fan) often has no clue why one guy won (since he can’t see that far ahead)! Then there’s all that memorization (of openings, of end games and everything in between). All that memorization is sort of against the spirit of the game, says Zachary Burns, “We want it to be a game of creativity and positional play.” Many have tried to change the rules of the game in the past for these exact reasons, including Bobby Fischer with his Chess960 variant. More recently, David Sirlin tried to make things interesting via his variant, Chess 2. So what are his c...
Read more

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn...
Read more