Judging Historical Figures

Is it right or fair to dishonour somebody from earlier eras based on today’s criteria of right and wrong? We’re used to that happening to political figures, but I didn’t realize it’s been happening in other non-political areas (science, philosophy, and ideologies) as well until I read Sean Welsh’s article.

 

Francis Galton, Darwin’s cousin, did a lot of data crunching of family trees and thereby strengthened the belief in the role of genetics. Inevitably, the data led him to being a supporter of eugenics, both selective breeding (positive eugenics) as well as discouraging the breeding of those with undesirable characteristics (negative eugenics). Given what followed next (Nazism, forced sterilizations in the US etc), perhaps you think it isn’t wrong that Galton’s name is being removed from several institutions in recent times? Wrong, says Welsh:

“(Because you’re tarring) Galton with the Nazi brush even though he died 32 years before Hitler came to power.”

Besides, isn’t prenatal screening done even today? To identify foetuses with horrific diseases, giving the parents (and the unborn child) a chance to be spared untold pain and suffering later…

 

Also, as Welsh reminds us, we can’t even cite the language used by the likes of Galton as evidence of a certain mindset:

“Today we speak of “children with special needs” rather than imbeciles, idiots, and mental defectives. However, I do not see how we can fairly criticise men of the past for using the language of their time rather than the more sensitive language of today.”

 

Is it fair to condemn “great men of the past (e.g., Linnaeus, Kant, and Voltaire)” as racists and white supremacists? Is it fair to call Darwin “racist and sexist”? Weren’t their views “neither atypical or extreme for his time”? How about Abraham Lincoln? Sure, he fought against slavery, but “he also opposed black voters and jurors on racist grounds”. So should we revile the man?

 

If we truly go down the road of impact of beliefs (the way we do with eugenics = Nazism), how come Karl Marx’s statues aren’t being torn down? Didn’t his work have “policy implications for social engineering and led to millions of deaths in Stalin’s gulags, Mao’s Great Leap Forward, and Pol Pot’s Killing Fields”?

 

Welsh clarifies that he isn’t saying nobody in history can be vilified. If there’s a direct chain to the effects (e.g. from Stalin to gulags; Hitler to the concentration camps), by all means, let’s revile them. But those guys cannot be put at par with the men who just subscribed to the beliefs of their times, or prescribed a policy that was implemented decades or centuries later leading to horrific outcomes.

 

All of which is why Welsh says:

“Instead of airbrushing history into good guys and bad guys, when it comes to intellectual giants, we should learn to take the rough with the smooth.”

Let’s apply the same maturity of how we view the ancient Greeks:

“Aristotle was a xenophobic and sexist defender of slavery. He also invented logic, biology, and what moderns call virtue ethics. We remember him for the latter not the former.”

And keep reminding ourselves that:

“The intellectual giants on whose shoulders we stand may be ogres on some moral points by modern standards. Even so, they helped us get science to where it is today. Their positive achievements should be honoured. If their normative failings were typical of their age, we should cut them a little slack. They were people of their time not ours.”

 

The title of Welsh’s article is perfect: “Standing on the Shoulders of Ogres”.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more