Silly Mistakes
I get very irritated when my 10 yo daughter makes “silly mistakes” in her school tests. You did the harder questions right. You knew the easy one; how then could you goof it up? To which she’ll retort: Everyone makes mistakes. Are you saying you’ve never made any?
I was reminded of that as I read Jonathan Rowson’s The Moves that Matter, where he described a chess match from 2006, where top chess program named Deep Fritz played world champion Vladimir Kramnik. Kramnik was playing black, and after 32 moves, this was the position:
It certainly looks
like Kramnik (black) has the upper hand here, as Rowson says:
It looks even
better for Kramnik (black) now: the rooks have been exchanged, the bishop is
threatening the white pawn, which looks doomed, following which his passed pawn
should win the game. And so, Kramnik tries to seal the game by offering to
exchange queens, by moving his (black) Queen to e3. Those watching the game
were aghast. Kramnik had committed the “blunder of the century”. The computer
simply moved its (white) Queen to h7. Checkmate.
How could a world
champion miss a mate-in-one sequence? Rowson explains:
“During
a game, we can never see positions without prejudice, literally without
prejudging in some way.”
Kramnik position’s
was stronger, the exchange of the rooks was to his benefit. He probably got
“caught up in his own exquisite narrative” that he couldn’t imagine the
immediate fatal threat to himself. And so he missed it.
(If you want to
see/play the entire game for yourself, go here. Or you could jump to the end via the
“>>” button and move back one move at a time).
And therein lies a
key difference between computers and humans:
“While
computers would make imperceptible errors that you have to work very hard to
exploit, they no longer made huge blunders.”
Comments
Post a Comment