Trump: Man or Representation?

So Trump lost. Santosh Desai is brutally honest about who won:

“Joe Biden is no one’s dream politician. But he represents a return to something familiar and comfortable, and for now, that seems to be more than enough.”

In other words, anyone but Trump. Hardly a positive sentiment.

 

Tom Nichols was quick to demonize those who voted for Trump:

“Sadly, the voters who said in 2016 that they chose Trump because they thought he was “just like them” turned out to be right. Now, by picking him again, those voters are showing that they are just like him: angry, spoiled, racially resentful, aggrieved, and willing to die rather than ever admit that they were wrong.”

It shows how polarized the US is today.

 

Not being an American allows Desai to be more objective than Nichols:

“(Trump) is a compendium of scandals. He is accused by not one but 26 women of sexual misconduct, he has lied and cheated in business, his family wallows in a very public form of nepotism, he has tried every trick in the book to prevent his tax records from becoming public, he is a bully who heaps scorn on anyone who offends him, in crude and demeaning ways.”

And yet, this time around, even though Trump lost:

“He has garnered 3 million more votes this time around.”

Goes to show how deep the fault lines in the US are.

 

The Chinese, of course, are quick to point at the growing racial conflicts and identity politics in the US as a sign of something bigger. Here’s what a Chinese editor Hu Xijin had to write:

“I believe the US political system has both strengths and weaknesses. Yet in terms of trend, it is degrading. It is neither as worthless as critics argue, nor as powerful and impeccable as worshipers portray. It is a typical case of the Western system that is gradually aging.”

Not surprisingly, he suggests:

“Few believe US Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden will make contribution to bridging the social divisions… This is not something a president, who only enjoys the support of a little over half of Americans, can change.”

 

Desai too says something similar:

“Nobody should be surprised if not even Trumpism, but Trump himself is back in 2024.”

 

as

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn...
Read more

Europe #3 - Innsbruck

The last city we visited in Europe was Innsbruck in the Austrian Alps. After the cold and windy experience (at times) of Paris and Netherlands, Innsbruck was a wonderful change – it didn’t feel that cold, it was not windy all of which made it easy to walk around. Something absolutely necessary given how scenic the place is.   Since the hotel check-in time was much later in the day, we left the baggage and went to the Swarovski HQ-cum-museum about an hour by bus from Innsbruck. The crystal exhibits were brilliant – colorful, bright, shiny. Jewellery aside, it was a display of what one can do with crystals. While my wife and daughter loved the jewellery, I liked the superhero themed exhibits of Batman, Spiderman, the Hulk, and Star Wars. We didn’t buy anything there, though we did buy stuff in the Swarovski store in Innsbruck – jewellery, not the superhero stuff.   Innsbruck is a major tourist attraction during the skiing season but now in summer, we saw many groups of ...
Read more

The Thrill of the Chase

So many people complain about the difficulty in making decisions while shopping. Do you buy Brand X that gives 20% extra free? Or Brand Y that has 10% off? Or Brand Z that gives something else free with it? Do you buy that flat screen TV today or wait for the sale at Diwali? Now since the customer is king, shouldn’t companies be simplifying pricing choices? Like maybe offering consistently low prices all the time? Not so fast, as the US store, JC Penney discovered to its cost. Turns out that while people do complain about pricing choices, they are irrational. Also, they enjoy the thrill of the chase. Huh? The word “sale” acts like a siren call for many people: it lures them in to make that purchase. Consistently low prices don’t do the same. Besides, if a competitor lowers their prices just one time of the year, and Poof! Suddenly that low price claim becomes suspect in shoppers’ eyes. Then there are those sites that offer coupons: have lunch at Restaurant A on Wedne...
Read more