No Difference, Just Look in the Mirror
Santosh Desai wrote
that BJP chief, Amit Shah, horrified him when he declared that the BJP would “act
against all infiltrators who were not Hindu, Sikh or Buddhist”. Why not just all infiltrators, why base it on
religion, asks Desai.
A valid question,
no doubt. Desai worries most about the BJP supporters who don’t support any religion based actions and laws.
Why? Because if you bring up topics like lynching or Shah’s comment with them,
it’s like water off a duck:
“If the subject is forced upon them, it is
either made little of (you know how media today pounces on any and every little
incident), dismissed as marginal (every party has lunatics, can’t take them
seriously), presented as the norm (these things have always happened in the
country, but now people with agendas amplify them), attributed to electoral
compulsions (in order to win elections, they have to say all kinds of things,
they don’t really mean it), sidestepped (after all every option comes with a
downside- we don’t live in a perfect world, and anyway what option do we have),
or justified(you can’t deny that Islam is the source of so much terrorism in
the world today, or they did conquer and persecute us, you know)).”
Desai ends his
lament with a very atypical the-end-is-near call:
“Whether one acknowledges it or not, today
one’s vote is a sign of whether one supports overt discrimination in the name
of religion or is standing against it.”
But one could ask
these questions to the supporters of the UPA: Why do they support only dynastic
parties/leaders, from Rahul to Akhilesh to Kumaraswamy to Stalin? Why are they
so against meritocracy? Why do they want Hindus to be apologetic for being the
majority? Why do they only care about the poor, not the tax paying middle
class? Why do they support Nyay like
schemes given Congress’ track record of corruption for decades (remember Rajiv
Gandhi’s admission that barely 5-15% made it to intended recipients?) and even
worse, Congress’ opposition to an identity/transfer-to-account system like
Aadhar that would make such schemes better today?
Sure, many UPA
supporters would privately acknowledge
many of the above points. But wouldn’t they still vote for the UPA anyway? How
then are they any different than the non-rabid BJP supporters?
Comments
Post a Comment