What's in a Species Name?


The most famous Latin name for a species must surely be “Tyrannosaurus rex”. Or just T.rex, as all dino fans know it so fondly. Recently I learnt that the naming convention for species (called “binomial nomenclature”) has 2 parts:
-         The first part is the genus; (I have no clue what a genus means!)
-         The second identifies the species within the genus.
Now keep in mind that we came up with this convention a couple of centuries back. And therefore, the genus was being decided based on appearance and visible (or inferable) attributes of the specimen.

Today, writes Svante Pääbo in his excellent book, Neanderthal Man: In Search of Lost Genomes, we can study the DNA of a specimen to know which species shared ancestors, and which ones are ancestors of which others. And so often we find that seemingly unrelated species shared common ancestors, or one was an ancestor of the other, even though they may have no visible similarities! As you can imagine, this new way of analyzing specimen often flat out contradicts the older non-DNA techniques used for centuries when it comes to species.

In any case, continues Pääbo, there is no clear definition of how you demarcate a species. The common idea that two species are demarcated if they can’t breed together or if they can’t produce a fertile offspring isn’t valid. He points out that polar bears and grizzly bears occasionally breed and produce fertile offspring. Yet, it sounds crazy to say they are the same species given how different they are!

When Pääbo and his team analyzed the DNA of Neanderthals, they found that they were a separate species from good old Homo Sapiens, and the two shared a common ancestor at some point. But, and this is key, there had also been interbreeding between the two! It fell upon Pääbo to give a come up with a name for the new species. He hated the prospect. Why?
“It has a tendency to elicit scientific debates that have no resolution. For example, if researchers refer to Neanderthals as “Homo neanderthalenis”, they indicate that they regard them as a separate species… If researchers say “Homo sapiens neanderthalenis”, they indicate that they see them as a subspecies.”
Controversy aside, how do you classify species that interbred?! The nomenclature wasn’t designed for this! Even worse, the binomial nomenclature system has another flaw, writes Pääbo:
“Once a name is in taxonomic literature, it cannot be withdrawn later.”

This whole binomial nomenclature seems very stupid to me: once a name has been (mis)assigned to a (non)species, we’re stuck. How do we then know which names correspond to “real” species as opposed to the “mistaken” species? And in any case, we don’t even know how to demarcate a species! And yet this system lives on… As Obelix would say, “These species namers are crazy!”

Comments

  1. Ramiah KumarMarch 12, 2018 at 7:08 PM

    I agree with what Obelix would surely say, "These species names are crazy!"

    Once the evolution scientists believed that neanderthals were non-human and there was no interbreeding. They were labeled brutes more or less (in common parlance); strangely the evolution scientists also believed that it was the homo sapiens who decimated the neanderthals and made them extinct. Yet, being homo sapiens, wanted to firmly believe, "homo sapiens were (and are) not brutes but human"! One can feel sure that all brutes would consider "being human is so bad that being brutes is surely pretty gentle!

    The blog-writer's confession, "I have no clue what a genus means!" is deprecated. :-) We insist that a future blog shall be there to redeem the deplorable knowledge situation! :-) Both the blog writer and the blog reader should be able to say afterwards, "Genus! What about it? Everyone is savvy".

    Even after that too, what Obelix might have said would remain, of course.:-) That is a hopeless scenario.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more