Surveillance Capitalism
Most of
continental Europe, and Germany in particular, is highly critical of the
disruption that the Internet wreaks on traditional companies. One such article
by Shoshana Zuboff was a criticism that a new form of capitalism is taking
over the world. She calls it “surveillance capitalism”:
“(It is) a wholly new subspecies of
capitalism in which profits derive from the unilateral surveillance and
modification of human behavior.”
And who’s doing
this surveillance? The big bad wolf, aka the Internet companies. She elaborates
what she means:
“The game is selling access to the
real-time flow of your daily life –your reality—in order to directly influence
and modify your behavior for profit.”
Why is it so easy
for companies to collect data about us?
“(Because it combines) the clandestine
coupling of the vast powers of the digital with the radical indifference and
intrinsic narcissism (of people).”
It’s hard to argue
with any of that. But typical of such criticisms, she then goes overboard:
“The very idea of a functional, effective,
affordable product as a sufficient basis for economic exchange is dying.”
Really? Does she
not get that the reason such “surveillance” is possible is because of the
ubiquitous smartphone, something owned in every corner of the world by people
of all incomes? Besides, does she really not know that the fraction of global
GDP that comes from the Internet sector is very small?
Zuboff also can’t
seem to get why most people have such “radical indifference” to the collection
and use of data about them: it’s because they get the service (like Google or
Facebook) for free. Which is why the “radical indifference” is not going away
any time soon.
Such ignorance of
the facts and willful ignoring of the obvious relation to the free’ness of Internet
services is commonplace among the critics from continental Europe. But she made
a remark in passing that this don’t-care-about-such-data-collection attitude is
“especially (true) in the Anglo economies.” It’s ironical that she doesn’t see
that very remark also dooms the probability of any global change in the
attitude towards surveillance capitalism:
-
Anglo
economies constitute a huge chunk of the world (US, Britain, Australia, Canada,
and in their attitude on most things, the former colonies of Britain): in other
words, most of the planet.
-
China
is a fan of it for altogether different reasons!
So who does that
leave? Oh yes, as Donald Rumsfeld contemptuously said, “Old Europe”.
Comments
Post a Comment