Do They Even Get the Internet?

The difference in attitudes towards freedom of speech and being practical about what is do’able is quite severe between Europe and the US. This is repeatedly brought out in all its gory detail every time you see the attitudes of the two sides when it comes to the Internet. Others say the clashes on Internet policy is not really an attitudinal one; rather, it is rooted in European resentment that all the big Internet companies are American (Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon and Apple) with barely any European company. Regardless of the reason, take a look at recent European rulings on these two topics.

Germany has framed a new rule to fine Internet companies upto €50 million if they don’t quickly remove offending content. As Mike Masnick wrote:
“Three loosely defined (and easily abused) categories: hate speech, criminal material and fake news.”
And as with so many other instances in the past, the Europeans still don’t understand that Facebook, Twitter and Google don’t create content; rather, they are forums for people to post content. So how is it right to fine the platform but leave the person(s) who created the content go scot-free? Methinks the Germans should pay the world for the pollution that their precious Volkswagon’s have inflicted by manipulating emission tests worldwide. But of course, holier-than-thou Germany will say that is somehow different.

The other instance is when the EU fined Google €2.42 billion for abusing “its market dominance as a search engine… (to rank higher) its comparison shopping service”. At first sight, this sounds like a sensible ruling. But think a bit more and you discover the devil in the details, says Ben Thompson:
-         Is Google truly a search monopoly given that it is the easiest thing in the world to switch to a different search engine?
-         Yes, on the Net, network effects are very strong (if everyone is on Facebook or WhatsApp, why would you join a competitor). But is that by definition a bad thing? Since Ronald Reagan, this is the US stance on monopolies:
“The U.S. is primarily concerned with consumer welfare, and the primary proxy is price. In other words, as long as prices do not increase — or even better, decrease — there is, by definition, no illegal behavior.”
-         If Google chose to rank its own entity high even though it is bad, surely people would switch to alternatives.
-         In any case, ranking items is a subjective choice, so in what sense can one say that Google’s ranking is not just wrong or bad, but criminal?

As always, European rulings are so poorly thought through that one can barely make any sense out of it. Unless, of course, it is just based on spite for American companies…

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more