Falsifiable or Not

In his highly informative book, The Most Powerful Idea in the World, on steam and how it shaped the Industrial Revolution, William Rosen made an interesting point about a long-debunked theory of heat. Called the phlogiston theory, it said that anything hot had more of something inside it – the eponymous phlogiston – that would get released as it cooled.

The theory did seem to explain why what was left of the wood after burning (ashes) weighed less than the wood itself: because the phlogiston would have been released. But other observable phenomenon contradicted the theory:
-         Some substances (e.g. magnesium) became heavier after being burnt, contrary to what the theory predicted.
-         Other substances didn’t change weight even if they cooled e.g. a hot iron bar put in water weighed the same after it had cooled and was taken out of the water.

Here’s the part about the theory that Rosen found interesting:
“Though phlogiston theory is wrong, it is considerably more scientific than is generally understood.”
Huh? What’s so great about a theory that was ultimately proven wrong, you wonder? Why is Rosen calling it “more scientific than is generally understood”?

The answer: because the phlogiston theory was falsifiable. Let Wikipedia explain what “falsifiable” means:
“A statement is called falsifiable if it is possible to conceive of an observation or an argument which negates the statement in question.”

Falsifiability is a must-have characteristic of a scientific theory, as per the philosopher of science, Karl Popper. This may sound trivial until you think of fields that are not falsifiable. Like astrology. Is there any single observation that could refute astrology?

Any field that has a No answer to that question is not science, as per the principle of falsifiability. Rosen’s appreciation for the phlogiston theory was because it was falsifiable, a rare thing back then even for scientific theories.

P.S. (The lack of) Falsifiability is also the reason why many physicists don’t consider certain modern day theories like the multiverse theory to be science either.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more