Vote for Whoever You Want
Have you ever
felt (or been told) that you’re wasting your vote by voting for a candidate or
party that has no chance of winning the election? In the US, the shrillness of
such accusations has gone up a notch, as pointed
out by Alan Jacobs:
“I keep hearing from Trump supporters
that if I vote for a third-party or write-in candidate — for convenience’ sake
let’s say Evan McMullin, though I may not
choose him — in this election I’m “really” or “effectively” voting for
Hillary Clinton. When I ask how that works exactly, I am told that it’s because
Hillary is leading and therefore my McMullin vote isn’t allowing Trump to catch
up.”
Wait a minute,
argues Jacobs. The winner in the US isn’t the guy who won the most votes (same
as India and UK), and so voting for the 3rd party candidate means
different things in different states:
“The argument must be that if you vote
for McMullin in a state where Hillary is ahead, you’re voting for Hillary,
but if you do it in a state where Trump is leading you’re voting for Trump.”
What about a
state that is too close to call? Jacobs again:
“If you do it (vote for the 3rd guy) in a
swing state I guess you won’t know until after the election who you voted
for.”
Therefore,
concludes Jacobs, the whole “effectively voting for X” argument is “nonsense on
stilts”. I am very amused by the rational way in which Jacobs poked holes in
the accusation.
Comments
Post a Comment