Cart Before the Horse

Take these 2 quotes about the purpose of a corporation. The first one is by Brad Bird, winner of two Oscars:
“Walt Disney’s mantra was, “I don’t make movies to make money—I make money to make movies.” That’s a good way to sum up the difference between Disney at its height and Disney when it was lost. It’s also true of Pixar and a lot of other companies. It seems counterintuitive, but for imagination-based companies to succeed in the long run, making money can’t be the focus. Speaking personally, I want my films to make money, but money is just fuel for the rocket. What I really want to do is to go somewhere. I don’t want to just collect more fuel.”
The second one is by Jony Ive, Apple’s user interface God:
“We are really pleased with our revenues but our goal isn't to make money. It sounds a little flippant, but it's the truth. Our goal and what makes us excited is to make great products. If we are successful people will like them and if we are operationally competent, we will make money.”

I can make a safe guess that you are smirking. Yeah right, you say.

Now consider Google’s endless moonshots (outrageously ambitious projects with very, very low chances of success). Hell, they even have an entire division for such projects!

All of the above could have chosen to be the stereotype of corporations that create a successful product and then milk it for all eternity. Apple could have stopped at the iPod. Or at the iPhone. But they didn’t, did they? Google could have stopped at search. Or at Android. And yet both companies keep entering (and dominating) entirely new areas, if not industries.

If you want an example of a company that did want to “just collect more fuel”, look no farther than Microsoft. Steve Ballmer decided to just keep milking Windows and Office, even when Apple and Google were visibly moving the planet to mobile and free apps. Guess who is considered a dinosaur now?

Unless you live in a cave, you’ll know which kind of company succeeds in a fast changing world. Well ok, maybe I over-generalized: the above approach is must-have for technology companies for sure since they operate in a brutally fast changing world.

Comments

  1. Ramiah KumarSeptember 28, 2016 at 1:34 PM

    Apart from the points of your argument, which I am not contesting, one needs to consider some extra factors when we discuss how corporations keep their lead. From time to time, the leading ability falters or circumstances so transpire that coping with change fails.

    One example is IBM. From the top position in the world in business computing domain, with defining power for heralding new developments both hardware and software, why did they have to become so less? Similarly, in our school and college days, Hewlett Packard was considered the pioneer par excellence. Why is it, today, they are fighting for survival from time to time?

    The question that follows is this. Would Google, Apple and such leaders also fall behind some time? Microsoft putting all their stakes on Windows is not what I am comparing with. I comparing with once-great-pioneers like IBM and HP. People will change and circumstances will change. The only thing constant is change etc..

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn...
Read more

Europe #3 - Innsbruck

The last city we visited in Europe was Innsbruck in the Austrian Alps. After the cold and windy experience (at times) of Paris and Netherlands, Innsbruck was a wonderful change – it didn’t feel that cold, it was not windy all of which made it easy to walk around. Something absolutely necessary given how scenic the place is.   Since the hotel check-in time was much later in the day, we left the baggage and went to the Swarovski HQ-cum-museum about an hour by bus from Innsbruck. The crystal exhibits were brilliant – colorful, bright, shiny. Jewellery aside, it was a display of what one can do with crystals. While my wife and daughter loved the jewellery, I liked the superhero themed exhibits of Batman, Spiderman, the Hulk, and Star Wars. We didn’t buy anything there, though we did buy stuff in the Swarovski store in Innsbruck – jewellery, not the superhero stuff.   Innsbruck is a major tourist attraction during the skiing season but now in summer, we saw many groups of ...
Read more

The Thrill of the Chase

So many people complain about the difficulty in making decisions while shopping. Do you buy Brand X that gives 20% extra free? Or Brand Y that has 10% off? Or Brand Z that gives something else free with it? Do you buy that flat screen TV today or wait for the sale at Diwali? Now since the customer is king, shouldn’t companies be simplifying pricing choices? Like maybe offering consistently low prices all the time? Not so fast, as the US store, JC Penney discovered to its cost. Turns out that while people do complain about pricing choices, they are irrational. Also, they enjoy the thrill of the chase. Huh? The word “sale” acts like a siren call for many people: it lures them in to make that purchase. Consistently low prices don’t do the same. Besides, if a competitor lowers their prices just one time of the year, and Poof! Suddenly that low price claim becomes suspect in shoppers’ eyes. Then there are those sites that offer coupons: have lunch at Restaurant A on Wedne...
Read more