When Morality Overrides Reality
Many say that
ISIS is not Islamic. Dalia Mogahed, for example, tries to “prove” that by suggesting
a thought experiment:
“If Islam did not exist … would a group
like ISIS, with all the other realities as they are, exist today and do the
same things?”
She feels the
answer to that hypothetical question is a “resounding yes”. In essence, she
says:
“We start at the violence we want to
conduct, and we convince ourselves that this is the correct way to interpret
the texts.”
I am sure there
are many out there who would agree with Mogahed’s reasoning.
Next, consider
why ISIS seems to have very few Indians. The reason
cited in a report created by MI6, CIA and a few Arab countries is that ISIS
considers Indians (and those from neighbouring countries) “inferior to Arab
fighters” and less motivated; pays them less and uses them mostly as cannon
fodder who are “forced to fight in the frontline”.
Most people who
agree with Mogahed’s line of thought are unlikely to believe the reason cited
in the previous paragraph. Even though the first is pure conjecture and the second
is far more fact based.
Sadly, we live
in a world where the notion of morality has been hijacked by the people who
prefer conjecture over facts, whose version of how the world should be trumps
how the world really is. And so they will praise Germany for taking in refugees
and curse the US for closing its doors. Even though the former is irrational to
the point of being suicidal and the latter is so much more pragmatic.
Comments
Post a Comment