Robo-graders

Robo-graders, or software that grades essays have been there for some time. But how good/useful is an algorithm to assess the quality of writing?

Les Perelman, a critic, says these algorithms don’t understand the meaning (obviously) and just use certain metrics like “length and the presence of pretentious language”:
“The fallacy underlying this approach is confusing association with causation. A person makes the observation that many smart college professors wear tweed jackets and then believes that if she wears a tweed jacket, she will be a smart college professor.”
Further, Perelman says that once kids know (or guess) how the algorithm works, they will write to suit the algorithm without worrying about content! A couple of students at Harvard demonstrated just that by writing an application that generates gibberish and yet gets rated highly by the algorithm.

Then again, as Chaitanya Ramineni, an ETS (Educational Testing Service) researcher, says, “human scoring suffers from flaws” too. Remember the dread with which most parents view the marking of board exams?

Another problem is rooted in the fact that any grading algorithm would have to be created by analyzing the qualities of good essays (as graded by humans). But this then means that such an algorithm would inevitably “punish creativity”. Let this article explain how:
“The computer judges “topical analysis” by favoring “similarity of the essay's vocabulary to other previously scored essays in the top score category.”
Ergo, anything different would, by definition, be considered worse!

But others do see benefits to algorithmic grading. Andrew Klobucar says that:
“His students are willing to revise their essays, even multiple times, when their work is being reviewed by a computer and not by a human teacher.”
Klobucar feels that happens because a human reviewer feels “corrective, even punitive” whereas an algorithm feels individualized yet not “personal”. Turns out there is even a term for this effect of technology on human behavior, the “disinhibition effect” (Outside education, it’s also seen in how honestly patients answer questions to software v/s doctors. Guess the eponymous Dr.House was right in asserting that patients always lie!). Amusingly, other researchers feel part of the reason why students are willing to revise and resubmit to a computer is that “the process of improving their writing appeared to take on a game-like quality, boosting their motivation to get better”!

Maybe the robo-grader has a place in the education system after all, just not to give grades.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more