Reactions to Google Glass

Google Glass is in the news a lot: it’s what they call “wearable” computing. Computing on things you wear, like glasses or watches. Like the smartphone, the Glass has a camera, GPS, Internet connectivity and understands voice commands. Glass (like spectacles) is always pointed at whatever it is you are looking at. Which is why you can give it instructions like “Glass, take a photo”. Or ask for info or ask for directions. With Glass, Google even managed to project info/directions on your, er, glasses without blocking your vision!

Ok, so that’s the gist of the device itself. Only 8,000 units in circulation (to handpicked applicants) and yet there have been strong reactions. The reaction about Glass’s impact on knowledge/education was:
“The idea is that we will all be better off if we’re always connected to the web, always on, and have uninterrupted and instantaneous access to it and humanity’s “knowledge.”…I think, though, that is a terribly deluded and shallow understanding of what it means to “learn” about something.”

Others worry about its impact on privacy: unlike conventional devices, you wouldn’t even know when someone is taking pics/videos/recording, they argue. The next worry is whether anonymity is lost? After all, the camera sees, and soon some facial recognition technology could identify even complete strangers for you (Such technologies already exist; but neither Facebook nor Google want to use them…yet. But for how long will it be before someone crosses that Rubicon? Didn’t Eric Schmidt, Google’s ex-CEO, once say “Google’s policy is to get right up to the creepy line and not cross it.”)

Then there is the impact on social etiquette. Scott Adams described it as “spatial smearing”, as in when two people are in the same room but one is mentally some place else. Glass would take that to a whole new level:
“At least with smartphones you can tell when someone's mind is elsewhere. But how happy will you be when you are having a conversation in person and your friend keeps glancing up to watch his little projection screen inside his glasses?”

Adams always likes to provoke you to make you think. In another blog, he wrote (only half-jokingly):
“I see the iWatch as the next phase in our evolution to full cyborg status. I want my Google glasses, iWatch, smartphone, and anything else you want to attach to my body. Frankly, I'm tired of being nothing but a skin-bag full of decaying organs. I want to be the machine I was always meant to be. That prospect excites me.”

Is Adams’ (second) view going to the majority view? Will Glass go the way Helen Keller way: “The heresy of one age becomes the orthodoxy of the next”?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more