The Right to Lie


How far should one take the freedom of speech? India goes to one extreme: just think of how we ban anything and everything the moment any random person says it offends him. Salman Rushdie’s book, MF Hussain’s paintings, Danish cartoons, the list is endless.

Vir Sanghvi wrote that that freedom of speech is really the freedom to offend. That doesn’t sound right at first, but Sanghvi’s went something like this: Isn’t freedom of speech the right of the speaker to say what he wishes, criticize who he wants? Otherwise, the way we yield to every radical group, aren’t we treating it as the right of the listener to not be offended by what others say?

Most countries that allow freedom of speech include the right to lie under its purview. Before you get all moralistic about it, consider taking things to an extreme and making all forms of lieing illegal. You’d then be stuck with having to differentiate the guy who lied knowingly from the guy who genuinely (but mistakenly) thought something was true. Prosecute enough people for lieing and soon enough, most people would be too scared to voice any accusation. Or criticism. Making lieing illegal sets you off on a slippery slope.

Of course, the other extreme of allowing all lies isn’t good either. So a few exceptions like defamation, fraud, incitement to violence etc are always made from the freedom of speech.

I think this is why no religion is suited to deciding how to govern. Religions are (usually) moralistic and (usually) focus on doing what’s right. So if you asked a religion, “Should lieing be allowed?”, they’d say No. But as we saw above, real life is tricky and there are obvious benefits to allowing people to lie, at least the unknowing lies. But in real life, since you can’t always spot a knowing lie from an unknowing lie, the governance principle needs to play it safe and allow (most) lies.

That doesn’t sound so good, but who said governance involved easy choices?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"