When Authority Figures Make Mistakes

Once an authority figure says something, we tend to believe it. You’d think this is not true in science and maths, but sadly, you’d be wrong.

 

Remember Millikan’s famous oil drop experiment to measure the charge of an electron from school days? Well, Millikan got the answer wrong. There was nothing wrong with the experiment itself, it was just that he’d used the incorrect value for the viscosity of air! It should have been easy for others to notice and correct this, right? Yes, but only at the beginning. But the error wasn’t caught early, and Millikan’s number becomes the accepted value everywhere. From that point onwards, it’s not easy to change it. Richard Feynman points out that:

“It’s interesting to look at the history of measurements of the charge of the electron, after Millikan.  If you plot them as a function of time, you find that one is a little bigger than Millikan’s, and the next one’s a little bit bigger than that, and the next one’s a little bit bigger than that, until finally they settle down to a number which is higher.”

Why didn’t the correction happen one shot? Why did it happen in steps?

“It’s a thing that scientists are ashamed of—this history—because it’s apparent that people did things like this: When they got a number that was too high above Millikan’s, they thought something must be wrong—and they would look for and find a reason why something might be wrong.  When they got a number closer to Millikan’s value they didn’t look so hard.”

 

Since all of quantum mechanics is highly mathematical (and unintuitive), it’s easy (and unavoidable) to believe things because the maths says so. Even more so if it comes from a giant of maths like John von Neumann. At a time when physicists were still struggling to make their peace with quantum mechanics, an alternative called the “hidden variables theory” was being explored. (It’s not necessary to know that that means for this blog). What is relevant is that von Neumann, a rock star mathematician of the era, announced a mathematical “proof” that “no hidden variables theory could be an accurate description of reality” in 1932. Except he had made an elementary error in his “proof”…

 

In this case, the error was found almost immediately. The refutation was published. And ignored. Why? Because the refuter was a woman. Because she came from a field unrelated to quantum mechanics. Because of the aura around von Neumann. And lastly because most physicists were not interested in alternatives to the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics: there was so much work to be done, why bother about interpretations?

 

The sad part in all this? Those alternate interpretations, the “hidden variables theories” thus had to wait almost a generation before a new set of physicists started to work on them.

 

Even in science and maths, human nature can’t be eliminated.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more