The Other Pax's the West won't Talk About
In The Great Tech Game, Anirudh Suri made an interesting list that got me thinking about how distorted Western versions of history are. He writes:
“In
recent history, the world has lived through Pax Romana, Pax Islamica, Pax
Mongolica, Pax Britannica and Pax Americana.”
Pax Islamica?
Pax Mongolica? I’d only
heard of the other three Pax’es…
Pax Islamica is
Suri’s term for the era when the Muslims controlled the global trade routes,
both on land and via the sea. Until the Muslims took over, each region on these
routes had its own trading practices and different legal traditions. The
Muslims standardized a lot of that – from Arabia to Malaysia, the same tax and
import-export rules were followed. This made things stable, predictable and
trade increased. The West won’t mean even mention this phase since they were
locked out of these routes by the Muslims who weren’t interested in the
“backwaters of Europe”…
While the era of
Muslim dominance is ignored in Western narrative, the Mongol era is actively
vilified. Even though at 9 million square miles of territory, it was the
world’s largest contiguous land empire. Even though it lasted for centuries.
Even though the Mongols created and secured land-based trade routes via
bridges, protection, and low taxes. Even though, unlike other empires of the
day, the Mongols didn’t promote a particular religion or political ideology.
Or was it perhaps
Europe’s resentment of the Mongols’ almost cosmopolitan practices that they are
despised so much? After all, the Mongols didn’t lock anyone out of their trade
routes – Europe could again trade with China. Perhaps there is an unwillingness
to acknowledge the benefits the West reaped, via the flow of ideas, learnings
and technologies from the East to the West (they’d rather believe they achieved
everything themselves, from scratch), not that:
“The
Silk Road began to emerge as a well-guarded conveyor belt of goods, people, and
ideas.”
Perhaps, the West resents that while they ensured
race-based division wherever they went, the “twain between East and West seemed
to finally be meeting” during Pax Mongolica. Or perhaps, the West is too
ashamed of the contrast that Marie Favereau mentions
in The Horde:
“The Mongols did not try to extract value
from subjects no matter the cost to the subjects -- that is, the Mongols did
not enslave their subjects and work them to death, as much later colonial
regimes in the Atlantic world did.”
Ignore the facts (as with Pax Islamica) or vilify the other side (Pax Mongolica) – that’s how the West writes it history books.
Comments
Post a Comment