Siren Song Called Legibility

In his book, Seeing Like a State, James C Scott wrote:

“The pre-modern state was, in many crucial respects, particularly blind; it knew precious little about its subjects, their wealth, their landholdings and yields, their location, their very identity. It lacked anything like a detailed “map” of its terrain and its people.”

The land and the people were both “illegible” to the government.

 

It therefore seemed obvious that knowing the land and the people, and even organizing them to make things “legible” to government would lead to better governance. From there, it is a short trip to what Venkatesh Rao describes:

“(The state) merely views them as resources that must be organized in order to yield optimal returns according to a centralized, narrow, and strictly utilitarian logic.”

That might sound ominous, but as Rao explains:

“The attempt to maximize returns need not arise from the grasping greed of a predatory state. In fact, the dynamic is most often driven by a genuine desire to improve the lot of the people.”

 

You must have guessed what happened next. If something (illegibility) is a problem, it doesn’t mean the opposite (organizing things to make them legible) is a good thing. Like the German government’s attempt to convert “wild and unruly forests” with their hard-to-quantify resources into “orderly stands of the highest-yielding varieties” led to environmental catastrophes. Other examples include Le Corbusier style “unlivable grid-cities like Brasilia”. And Chandigarh.

 

And yet this tendency to organize the messy real world and make things “legible” is practiced by governments, big companies and even individuals. Why? For one, our brains are wired that way. In general:

“The brain goes nuts trying to find order in the chaos.”

 

Rao cites an interesting example of something where making things legible worked out well: standardized time zones. “The bewilderingly illegible geography of time in the 18th century” gave way to a “systematic, global scheme for measuring time, with sensible time zones”. This is another reason why the idea of making things legible is so appealing: it’s a good idea, we feel, with some exceptions. Wrong, says Rao:

“The reason the formula is generally dangerous, and a formula for failure, is that it does not operate by a thoughtful consideration of local/global tradeoffs, but through the imposition of a singular view as “best for all” in a pseudo-scientific sense.”

Thus, because (1) illegible chaos is hard to make sense of, (2) our brains are wired to abhor chaos and love patterns, and (3) we truly believe we are organizing the world to make it a better place, “the relative simplicity and platonic orderliness” of legibility becomes a siren song that we are unable to turn a deaf ear to.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more