Clash of the Three Types of "Free"


When the recent terrorist attack in Christchurch (New Zealand) was broadcast live on Facebook, many went ballistic at social media for having no filters/checks against such material. And many have been cursing Facebook and WhatsApp for circulating “fake news”. Few would deny that we have major problems on these fronts. That said, there is no clear solution either.

Let’s see why it is so hard to fix these things. As Ben Thompson writes, on the Internet, we are used to things being free. And there are three types of “free”:
““Free as in speech” means the freedom or right to do something
“Free as in beer” means that you get something for free without any additional responsibility
“Free as in puppy” means that you get something for free, but the longterm costs are substantial”
Many of us agree with the “Free as in speech” part to varying degrees. But what the world gets via social media is a combo of two free’s:
“Facebook and YouTube offer “free as in speech” in conjunction with “free as in beer”: content can be created and proliferated without any responsibility.”
See the problem? Social media doesn’t care about the “free as in puppy” aspect.

The naïve response is to demand that social media include the “free as in puppy” aspect. But think it through and you’ll see the problems with that:
1)      Do we really want social media companies to decide what speech should be curbed? Or should governments regulate such matters? Doesn’t this sound like a choice between two devils?
2)     Regardless of who decides, it would still be individual sites that would have to apply the rules. Can every website have the skills and ability to write the software for such rules? Across the varying rules of multiple countries? If not, and only large companies with developers (and lawyers) can even attempt to apply the rules of filtering content, are we just making Facebook and Google even more bigger than they are?

Then there’s the fact that most of the Web is ad driven:
“The incentives of an advertising business drive them to focus on engagement, i.e. giving users what they want, no matter how noxious.”
And no, there’s no hope on that front because consumers aren’t willing to pay, as Caleb S.Fuller’s paper points out:
“Significantly, 86% of respondents express no willingness to pay for additional privacy when interacting with Google. Among the remaining 14%, the average expressed willingness to pay is low.”

We need people to go beyond cursing WhatsApp and YouTube, to understand the complexities involved, and a willingness to see if the proposed cure is worse than the disease. One can only hope that we’ll get to some kind of solution one day…

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more