Not Even Wrong


Not even wrong. Here’s what that phrase means:
“The phrase implies that not only is someone not making a valid point in a discussion, but they don't even understand the nature of the discussion itself, or the things that need to be understood in order to participate.”

The phrase perfectly describes Aatish Taseer’s apocalyptically titled article in TIME magazine, “Can the World’s Largest Democracy Endure Another Five Years of a Modi Government?”. Here’s why:
1)       It applies Western norms of what is politically acceptable, Western norms of what cannot be said by politicians and so on. But of course, this is India and the rules of political discourse are very different here.
a)     Taseer talks of Modi’s “deafening silences after more recent atrocities” (aka Godhra). But in India, Rajiv Gandhi’s widow and son have shown the same deafening silence wrt the 1984 killing of Sikhs. Two wrongs don’t make a right, but this is a reflection of Indian citizens who, depending on their political orientation, selectively care about one massacre but not the other.
b)     He accuses Modi of tearing down India’s secular and liberal edifice without providing any “alternative moral compass”. But he doesn’t mention the extra-constitutional mother-son duo of Sonia-Rahul who ran the country during Manmohan Singh’s tenure. Or Bal Thackerey’s remote control rule of Maharashtra. Those too were a subversion of democratic institutions. The bar had been lowered long before Modi; and yes, Indian democracy still thrives despite all of that.
2)     He quotes Modi’s “You know what is my crime for them? That a person born to a poor family is challenging their Sultunate [sic]”. But that’s just a shot at the the Congress’ high-class contempt for his chaiwala origins and the Opposition’s love for dynasties (Gandhis, Scindias, Pilots, Mulayam-Akhilesh Yadav, Karunanidhi-Stalin etc).
3)     He cites individual instances of violence against minorities as if it is a continuous phenomenon since 2014. If what happens here is “continuous”, then there is “continuous” violence against blacks in the US too.
4)     Taseer criticizes Modi’s government on women, ignoring that it is a cultural problem regardless of Modi, Rahul Gandhi or Kumaraswamy.
5)     He criticizes Rahul Gandhi as an “unteachable mediocrity” but doesn’t get the bigger problem that by offering him as the alternative to Modi, the Congress creates much revulsion which in turn boosts Modi even more.
6)     Taseer criticizes the choice of a “hate-mongering priest in robes of saffron”, Yogi Adityanath for CM of UP but doesn’t mention the Congress’ choice of Kamal Nath, one of the 1984 riots accused, for CM. Criminals as politicians is the norm in India, not something Modi introduced.
7)     He doesn’t approve of “extreme nationalism” but fails to see it as a reaction to decades of anger and frustration at Pakistan’s unabated terrorism.
8)    Taseer quotes the BJP declaration (“We will remove every single infiltrator from the country, except Buddha [sic], Hindus and Sikhs.”) as if it is bad. Why exactly? No country is obliged to keep illegal infiltrators. And every country has its policy on who it prefers to take in (the US always preferred whites and Christians until recently, Israel is open to Jews, and don’t even get me started on Islamic countries), so what exactly is wrong with Modi’s stance again?

So, don’t worry, TIME and Taseer, India will easily “endure” another term of Modi. Just as the US will outlast Trump and Britain will survive Brexit. Our democracy is strong and resilient, and Modi has done nothing that compares to Indira Gandhi’s emergency… and we got through that. We need neither your concern nor your condescension.

Tyrion Lannister once said in Game of Thrones:
“Everywhere she (Daenerys) goes, evil men die and we cheer her for it. And she grows more sure that she is good and right.”
The danger which we really face is that the resounding repeat victory, the even greater majority, this despite a measure as drastic as demonetization, may convince Modi that everything he does is “good and right”. And while that went to Daenerys’ head, I doubt that’ll happen with Modi. But sure, it’s a possibility, but that’s not the argument Taseer makes. The case he makes is, well, not even wrong.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more