Contradiction

When it comes to data about the stuff we do being available to (and used by) our phones and apps, most people don’t seem to care. Is it because we feel that it makes no sense to be so possessive about something we didn’t even know had any value to anyone? Or is it a calculated move, a la what Tyrion Lannister advised Daenerys in Game of Thrones:
“You didn’t even know it (dragonglass) was here; it’s nothing to you. Give him something by giving him nothing.”
If the alternative is to pay for the services that Google, Facebook and WhatsApp provide, then it seems most of us would rather give them something (data) by giving them nothing (we care about). We seem to take the Tyrion approach:
“Let him mine the dragonglass. If he’s wrong, it’s worthless.”
Like Daenerys gave Jon Snow dragonglass; we give Google and Facebook data!

Given that’s our stance with data about ourselves (who we know, who we interact with, location, where we go, what interests us etc) when it comes to Google and Facebook, why do some people get so bent out of shape when it comes to Aadhar?! As Nandan Nilekani, the brains behind Aadhar, says so exasperatedly, Aadhar only has our name, gender, data of birth and address. Contrast that with what the Internet giants know about us!

But wait, there’s more. Google and Facebook are American companies; so our data could be made available to the American government, when asked for by US law agencies. So we’re OK with the American government knowing about us but not the Indian government? We don’t mind sharing practically every aspect of our lives with the American government, but can’t even share our name, gender, DOB and address with the Indian government?

I would really love the Aadhar bashers to explain the “logic” behind their stance… and no, hiding behind the “privacy” word isn’t an answer. Because, as we just saw, we share far, far more personal stuff with Google and Facebook (and thereby, potentially the American government).

C’mon, let’s hear it, I am all ears…

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn...
Read more

Europe #3 - Innsbruck

The last city we visited in Europe was Innsbruck in the Austrian Alps. After the cold and windy experience (at times) of Paris and Netherlands, Innsbruck was a wonderful change – it didn’t feel that cold, it was not windy all of which made it easy to walk around. Something absolutely necessary given how scenic the place is.   Since the hotel check-in time was much later in the day, we left the baggage and went to the Swarovski HQ-cum-museum about an hour by bus from Innsbruck. The crystal exhibits were brilliant – colorful, bright, shiny. Jewellery aside, it was a display of what one can do with crystals. While my wife and daughter loved the jewellery, I liked the superhero themed exhibits of Batman, Spiderman, the Hulk, and Star Wars. We didn’t buy anything there, though we did buy stuff in the Swarovski store in Innsbruck – jewellery, not the superhero stuff.   Innsbruck is a major tourist attraction during the skiing season but now in summer, we saw many groups of ...
Read more

The Thrill of the Chase

So many people complain about the difficulty in making decisions while shopping. Do you buy Brand X that gives 20% extra free? Or Brand Y that has 10% off? Or Brand Z that gives something else free with it? Do you buy that flat screen TV today or wait for the sale at Diwali? Now since the customer is king, shouldn’t companies be simplifying pricing choices? Like maybe offering consistently low prices all the time? Not so fast, as the US store, JC Penney discovered to its cost. Turns out that while people do complain about pricing choices, they are irrational. Also, they enjoy the thrill of the chase. Huh? The word “sale” acts like a siren call for many people: it lures them in to make that purchase. Consistently low prices don’t do the same. Besides, if a competitor lowers their prices just one time of the year, and Poof! Suddenly that low price claim becomes suspect in shoppers’ eyes. Then there are those sites that offer coupons: have lunch at Restaurant A on Wedne...
Read more