Genuine Bilinguals
When Indians like
us take our kids to school the first time, we worry whether our kids will pick
up English fast enough. The need and
benefits of knowing English, other than their mother tongue, is obvious.
That’s not the
case with Americans. Except if they are married to foreigners. Like Robert Lane
Greene, who is married to a Finnish woman, wants to “raise a genuine
bilingual”.
It was interesting
to read his take on the whole topic since for us, the benefit of knowing
English is obvious, whereas for them, the benefit of knowing anything other
than English is, well, questionable.
But we’ll get back
to the benefits later. Let’s start with the “how to” part. Lane can think of
two strategies in case of parents, who between themselves, know multiple
languages well: “one parent, one language”, and “one language at home, the
other outside”. Most Indians follow one or both patterns while raising our
genuine bilinguals. And yet I wasn’t aware of this problem:
“Bilinguals hit developmental milestones at
the same rate as their monolingual peers. But they are prone to errors, and
their total vocabulary is divided between two languages. So they usually lag
behind slightly in the vocabulary of the schooling language.”
Maybe I didn’t
even know of the problem because I have always been far more fluent in the
“vocabulary of the schooling language”. Or is Greene right when he points out
another finding?
“The culprit was poverty, not
bilingualism.”
The prevailing
wisdom in the West today points to the “bilingual advantage”:
-
Cognitive
strengths;
-
Dementia
sets in a few years later, on average;
-
Better
brain function recovery after strokes;
-
Ability
to understand different perspectives better;
-
Better
ability to plan and carry out complicated tasks.
But none of these
are definitive: many of these findings are contested and/or not reproducible.
So even though I
couldn’t relate to (or even care about) most of the benefits, the last benefit
on the list above did hit a cord. I can absolutely relate to the willingness of
all parents to take a shot at “anything that might keep the child focused on
that calculus problem and ignoring the nearby smartphone”.
After all, when it
comes to their kids, all parents pick Newton over Steve Jobs, even if the
common item for both was Apple.
Comments
Post a Comment