Scream-fests Over News

If someone who sees the indignant scream-fests that pass for prime time “news” wonders why they are so popular, the answer is simple: after a long day at work, many just want to sit back and be entertained. As Valson Thampu wrote:
“Party spokespersons can fight no-holds-barred in full public view, and not put us off, because we know – and they know that we know – they mean no harm and are only jousting with each other in jest.”

While that is undoubtedly true, Santosh Desai points out that there are genuine differences of views, which the prime time “news” channels know to use:
“Media speaks of and to its consuming constituency, framing events through the lens of what interests its audience. This has distorted any possibility of aggregating a sense of reality in a coherent and meaningful form. By setting up news as a conflict between a given number of worldviews, it works hard at placing its viewers in different camps.”
No wonder then, with each news outlet (plus Facebook) catering to its specific base, nobody ever gets the big picture nuanced view of multiple perspectives:
“The liberals overestimate the degree to which their ideas have automatic currency, the right overestimates the number of people who believe in the things that they do and the ‘nation’ that media invokes so often is nothing more than its narrow consuming base. What we are seeing today are many privately held realities, each catering to its own little constituency and believing in its own power, thanks to the access it enjoys to different forms of media.”

Seeing such a distorted picture also lets us, the viewer, feel superior and pour scorn on anyone who comes on TV, says Alex Balk:
“These people don’t know anything more than you do… Plus you at least have the good sense to shut your stupid mouth every now and again.”
That last point (making the viewer feel superior) will probably keep that format popular. And so the entertainment (or drivel) factor will probably drive out news and analysis for the foreseeable future.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why we Deceive Ourselves

In their book, The Elephant in the Brain , the authors describe this weird aspect of deception that we practice: deceiving ourselves! That is so weird: “If our minds contain maps of our worlds, what good comes from having an inaccurate version of these maps?” The Sigmund Freud school of thought treats self-deception as a defense mechanism, “a way for the ego to protect itself”. The mind seeks to protect itself from anxiety and other negative emotions. Many object to this reasoning: since accurate information is so critical to our survival, surely distorting information would be dangerous. Wouldn’t the goal of protecting our self-esteem have been better achieved by making the brain’s self-esteem mechanism stronger instead? The new school of thought explains self-deception as “primarily outward-facing, manipulative, and ultimately self-serving”. This is based on Thomas Schelling’s work on game theory: “In a variety of scenarios, limiting or sabotaging yourself is the winn...
Read more

Europe #3 - Innsbruck

The last city we visited in Europe was Innsbruck in the Austrian Alps. After the cold and windy experience (at times) of Paris and Netherlands, Innsbruck was a wonderful change – it didn’t feel that cold, it was not windy all of which made it easy to walk around. Something absolutely necessary given how scenic the place is.   Since the hotel check-in time was much later in the day, we left the baggage and went to the Swarovski HQ-cum-museum about an hour by bus from Innsbruck. The crystal exhibits were brilliant – colorful, bright, shiny. Jewellery aside, it was a display of what one can do with crystals. While my wife and daughter loved the jewellery, I liked the superhero themed exhibits of Batman, Spiderman, the Hulk, and Star Wars. We didn’t buy anything there, though we did buy stuff in the Swarovski store in Innsbruck – jewellery, not the superhero stuff.   Innsbruck is a major tourist attraction during the skiing season but now in summer, we saw many groups of ...
Read more

The Thrill of the Chase

So many people complain about the difficulty in making decisions while shopping. Do you buy Brand X that gives 20% extra free? Or Brand Y that has 10% off? Or Brand Z that gives something else free with it? Do you buy that flat screen TV today or wait for the sale at Diwali? Now since the customer is king, shouldn’t companies be simplifying pricing choices? Like maybe offering consistently low prices all the time? Not so fast, as the US store, JC Penney discovered to its cost. Turns out that while people do complain about pricing choices, they are irrational. Also, they enjoy the thrill of the chase. Huh? The word “sale” acts like a siren call for many people: it lures them in to make that purchase. Consistently low prices don’t do the same. Besides, if a competitor lowers their prices just one time of the year, and Poof! Suddenly that low price claim becomes suspect in shoppers’ eyes. Then there are those sites that offer coupons: have lunch at Restaurant A on Wedne...
Read more