Spellings

My 4 year old is now being taught to read at school. Soon enough, the tyranny of spelling will follow. English is so crazy in its spellings: When does one use a “c” instead of a “k”? Indian languages are so much more logical in their spellings (sigh)…

But should spellings even matter? Om Malik pointed out that we skim rather than read anyway. Its title was deliberately mis-spelled: “Olny srmat poelpe can raed this”. And yet, you could read it without effort, couldn’t you?

Ok, even if you couldn’t, it’s probably because you weren’t prepared for it. Let’s try reading a longer sample where practically every single word is misspelled:

If you’re even reasonably comfortable at English, that passage would have been a breeze.

Wait a minute: would it have been possible to read it if the letters in the middle were completely different from the letters in the correct spelling? Obviously not. So does that mean we still need to learn the spelling, if not exact, at least close enough?

But think a bit more: if close enough is good enough (and Auto-correct can do the rest in the increasingly digital word that our kids will inherit anyway), isn’t it time we did away with the Spelling Nazis at school and college?

Comments

  1. By the way, when you mentioned that "Indian languages are so much more logical in their spellings (sigh)…". I felt like drawing attention to the two components of organizing alphabetical scripts in India. One focused on bringing fair correlation between spoken and written ways. No script actually succeeded in this entirely because some mismatch always existed. But we will certainly agree it was a pretty good approach. No wonder, for Sanskrit alphabet representation(not Hindi, please keep in mind)there are so many equivalents of Devanagari which are all pretty good.

    The second aspect is about alpha organization. In the European languages, it is a jumble of vowels and consonants. In Sanskrit, the organization is really good. They separated vowels from consonants, and established a vowel-consonant linkage, which simply stood out in the alpha organization. Needless to say, that the "matra" or length of vowel also given clear identification. For example, let us assume, repeat assume, 'a' and 'aa' represent short and long forms of the 'a' sound. (In English there is no telling if it ever would work that way!) But in Devanagari equal, there are clear "matra" identification in the vowel structure.

    I also understand that India is the first to come up with a theory of sounds, we should call them 'notes', which is very impressive. Of course, this was done in South India, as applicable for Carnatic Music. Even the Hindustani people do not read this theory much, but this understanding is a must for all Carnatic Music enthusiasts. I understand that this method was looked at by some European Music experts who actually included this idea in their discussion regarding Classical European Music. In that sense they acknowledged the basics proposed.

    I suppose this society has the ability for "fundamentalism" in religion, but not in the way of Semitic religion where the word "fundamentalism" has gained a negative connotation. (By "fundamentalism" in the Indic context, I mean asking and facing all those questions that can uproot faith relentlessly.)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"