Narendra Modi and the Donald Trump Parallel

I have these ongoing debates with my dad on Narendra Modi. And that got me thinking of the parallels with Donald Trump. No matter what they did or said, they are extremely popular during election campaigns. And even win. But how can that be? How can such things happen in countries with a free press, with freedom of speech? How can it happen in a growing country and a rich country?

Howard Kurtz points out how aggravating Trump is to his detractors:
“They struggle to understand why he pays no penalty when they blow the whistle. What they don’t quite grasp is that their attacks only make him stronger. This is not to let him off the hook for mistakes, just to recognize that Trump has completely rewritten the rule book, infuriating those who thought they enforced the rules.”
Those lines would apply equally to how many feel about Modi.

But why doesn’t all this “blowing the whistle” work? Matt Taibbi talks of an increasingly common approach these days:
“(A common approach is to) Blame the backlash on media bias and walk away a hero.”
Even if the candidate/PM doesn’t do it, his supporters on social media do take this approach.

Further, the rules of politics aren’t like the laws of physics. They change over time. What’s unacceptable yesterday can be the norm tomorrow. And that transition catches many unawares. As Jay Rosen wrote:
“The whole system rested on shared beliefs about what would happen if candidates went beyond the system as it stood cycle to cycle. Those beliefs have now collapsed because Trump “tested” and violated most of them— and he is still leading in the polls.”
So too did Modi during the 2014 elections.

Why is this happening? Mostly because voters are sick of existing candidates and their political correctness (aka “secularism” in Indian context). Katy Tur:
“I asked them what they think of Donald Trump and whether or not they’re bothered by his inaccurate statements and whether they think they matter. And not a single one of them said that they thought it mattered. They said they like him because they think he’s going to be a strong leader, and they think he’s going to bring the change to Washington that they want.”
That applies almost entirely to Modi as well. The danger, of course, is whether you get a strong leader like Winston Churchill or a strong leader like Adolf Hitler? But once a country votes for weak leaders who run the country to the ground, more and more people become willing to take their chances with a strong leader. And only time will tell which kind of strong leader they voted for.

Comments

  1. Ramiah KumarDecember 9, 2015 at 11:54 AM

    Your line, "Further, the rules of politics aren’t like the laws of physics. They change over time", made me stop to think.

    I love and understand physics and maths. My knowledge in these domains is limited but their methods and principles are unmistakably clear to me. What I am trying to discuss here is I am not able to feel any certainty about the answer to "if the laws of physics do not change with time". Unfortunately, I am totally off the track with the blog's theme! (Yes, Vijay, you have some good perspective to present in the blog.) Now allow me continue with irrelevance!

    This question of "whether physics or mathematics are true?" in some absolute sense, is very much like a "kuon" of Zen Buddhism! Since all laws that are perceived and expressed by humans are nothing but human conceptualizations, they can be either erroneous or they may fall short of accuracy or they may lack completeness. Nobody knows if they are out there in nature itself as reality! So the laws can be, actually do, get replaced with newer versions. On the whole, even physics' laws are like computer programs: version 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 then 2.1, 2.2 etc! Mathematics scores considerably better than physics in this regard, but even mathematics is built on a foundation of "trustworthy convictions", never "absolute or core truth"!

    Having said that, I know why you used that line to develop your point. Actually, I should not be drawing attention to it at all. I went into distraction because I love this thing about physics and maths: their foundations are not all that absolute, what most people naively believe! I jumped at the opportunity, that is all! :-( or is it :-)

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more