Technology Ain't Magic

Towards the end of last year, Apple and Google had announced that the latest versions of iOS and Android (iOS8 and Android L at that point) would be designed such that even Apple and Google themselves couldn’t decrypt the data on your device. This was done to convince the public that law enforcement agencies couldn’t snoop on your data (No, this wasn’t just a claim: it is the way the maths of encryption and decryption works).

If you are wondering whether to trust a claim based on maths you don’t know or understand, well, at least you’re honest about your lack of understanding of the topic. That honesty makes you better than the Washington Post editorial board!

The Washington Post editorial (WaPo for short) starts with a legitimate concern: if nobody but the device owner can decrypt the data, wouldn’t this be a boon for terrorists and criminals? They then acknowledge a valid counter-argument:
“But there are legitimate and valid counter arguments…They say that a compromise isn’t possible, since one crack in encryption — even if for a good actor, like the police — is still a crack that could be exploited by a bad actor.”
And yet, WaPo asks Apple and Google “to create a kind of secure golden key that could unlock encrypted devices, under a court order, when needed”.

Now I am confused: if the counter arguments are “legitimate and valid”, how does WaPo then conclude that a “golden key” can still be provided?

Jon Evans answers my question in this scathing article. The short answer is that the WaPo believes what Arthur C. Clarke once said:
“Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”
Evans points out the danger of the my-ignorance-makes-it-magic mindset:
“It makes non-engineers begin to believe that technology really can do anything its wizard-engineers desire.”
He quotes security experts who fully agree with the counter argument that WaPo itself cites! And agrees with Elissa Shevinsky who once said:
“We cannot bend software or cryptography to our will. Technology is science, not magic.”
In any case, as Evans correctly says, even if Apple and Google create this “golden key” for law enforcement, it’s like locking the stables after the horses have bolted:
“This kind of magical thinking will still not prevent genuine bad guys from using strong encryption without back doors. That genie is long out of the bottle, widely available, and open-source.”

I think the above points (tech isn’t magic; and the un-decryptable algorithms are already out there for the real bad guys to use anyway) prove why WaPo is, to quote Evans, “breathtakingly dumb”. Evans then looks into the technical knowledge levels of the WaPo editorial board:
“If any of them has the slightest hint of a technical background, their biographies hide it well. And yet they are happy to pontificate stentorian nonsense on a subject where they are effectively illiterate.”
But hey, like in politics, when did ignorance ever prevent the news media from voicing an opinion on topics they don’t understand?

Comments

  1. KumarAugust 5, 2015 at 4:53 PM

    As usual I am latching on to your finish line to say something! And, that happens to be irrelevant to your theme unfortunately. What to do, I can't help pouring out!

    Let alone "preventing the news media from voicing an opinion on topics they don’t understand". If we know what some of our TV presenters are doing, it would appear that media wants to be (1) a mighty church having absolute control over our behavior and values, (2) Stalins having total grip over people, not wanting them to think beyond what pleases the media, (3) Hollywood movie's manipulator villain who goes great length in order to mind-control others - in our context media wanting to whip up viewers' emotions at will, so that much unrest in the society is possible!

    Sometimes I wonder if some of the media extremists are nothing beyond ignorant crooks.

    And yet, media being a mixture of good and evil, we better suffer it. [Like: If we conceptualize a God who is the governor of the world or all that is nature, then we have the compulsion to imagine the necessary by-product, Satan too! This truth we learnt from the Semitic religions, no?] Only, if we the people attain better caliber, then media will have the compulsion to follow suit. Not only the media, even politics and governance shall be different. Let's hope for it - that is, people desiring and demanding better environs - both in the mind domain and the physical world.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Student of the Year

Image
As a toddler, my daughter loved Alia Bhatt’s songs, esp. the ones from Student of the Year . (That movie did have many good songs and well-choreographed dances). Fast forward to present day, when she is 12 yo. She rarely watches Hindi movies now, but one of the few ones she likes of late, Raja aur Rani ki Prem Kahani has, yes, Alia Bhatt.   If I had any hopes that there was anything to be read in the name of her toddler-time favorite ( Student of the Year ), they have been dashed. Our conversations come exam time are perfectly captured by this photo and its caption: In fact, the pic below captures how she and I look at her answer sheets – me intently, she with an expression of “It’s over, so why are you even looking at it?”   Of late, we pull her leg and tell her that she isn’t showing any signs of academic prowess, she’d better find a rich guy to marry. Some time later, she showed us this meme on the Internet: “Me No Study, Me No Care Me Go Marry Millionaire If He Die
Read more

The Retort of the "Luxury Person"

Image
Coming up with biting and witty retorts. It’s something we dream of, but rarely manage to pull off. Worse, the more we stew over the offending remark, the more likely we are to come up with that dream retort, as Calvin ruefully points out: During our last holiday at the Taj Resort, seeing my wife carrying towels to our poolside chairs, one of the kids there mistook her for a member of the staff and asked for a towel. When my wife narrated this to us, I did not imagine that my 8 yo daughter would come up with her own retort. But a day later, my daughter recapped the incident, an incident that didn’t even involve her in the first place , and said, “You know what I’d have told that kid who asked for the towel?”. And without waiting for an answer, she told us anyway: “I don’t work here. I too am a luxury person who is living at this resort. Go get your own towel.” We were highly amused by the phrase she had coined: “luxury person”. It certainly captures the kind of holid
Read more

Animal Senses #7: Touch and Remote Touch

Instinctively, we think touch is based on contact. Not entirely true, explains Ed Yong in Immense World – there’s a more important aspect than contact: “These incredible feats are possible through movement. If you rest a fingertip upon a surface, you can get only a limited idea of its features. But as soon you’re allowed to move, everything changes. Hardness becomes apparent with a press. Textures resolve at a stroke.” As you run your fingers over a surface, they hit the tiny peaks and troughs and set off vibrations in the mechanoreceptors at their tips.   At the tip of its snout, the star-nosed mole has many pairs of hairless appendages. It uses them to touch things around itself. Alive or dead? Food or ignore? It does these movements at an insane speed. In the time it takes to blink our eyes, the star-nosed mole can probe, identify and swallow its food. “Light may be the fastest thing in the universe, but light sensors have their limits, and the star-nosed mole’s sense of
Read more